Royal Panda roulette

Author Topic: To all mathematician here  (Read 20378 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mike

Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #30 on: January 22, 2016, 09:01:09 AM »
Trilobite,

Quote
If it couldn't beat the first million spin trial then what would be the point of continuing? In fact, what would be the point of continuing the trial beyond say 200k spins? If the system can’t beat 200k spins then what’s the point of continuing? Even 100k should be defeated before bothering any further.

I agree... not sure what your point is. If a system really "beats" roulette then shouldn't it continue to generate profits no matter how many spins you test it over? If it fails at 50k spins on one run and then at 100k on another, then it obviously hasn't beaten roulette and you've proved nothing, but if the more bets you make the higher the profit then I think even Real would have to admit you have something.

Quote
There are other factors worth considering, like realistic table limits and practical drawdowns. What’s the point of testing systems outside the reality of accepted gaming conditions?

No point at all. But presumably your system has rules for all this and requires certain house limits, etc. Any competent programmer can simulate all of that. The only thing required for an accurate simulation is a precise set of rules or algorithm. If you can draw up a flowchart for it then it can be simulated. The only thing that can't be simulated is the XXVV style of system (intuition, psychokinesis, drawing on the universal mind, numerology, and other gibberish).
 

Real

  • Fighting the war on absurdity one foolish idea at a time.
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1693
  • Thanked: 288 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #31 on: January 22, 2016, 06:02:35 PM »
The XXVV method appears to be, change the rules as you go, curve fit, and then use phrases and words from other fields of science out of context in a vein attempt to try and dazzle the reader.

His stock market thread is equally absurd.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2016, 06:04:34 PM by Real »
 

Trilobite

Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #32 on: January 23, 2016, 05:37:37 AM »
His stock market thread is equally absurd.

What?
You actually read that fluff?
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1987
  • Thanked: 351 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #33 on: January 23, 2016, 09:22:48 AM »
The XXVV method appears to be, change the rules as you go, curve fit, and then use phrases and words from other fields of science out of context in a vein attempt to try and dazzle the reader.

His stock market thread is equally absurd.

I've never met greater gambler than Caleb Johnson aka Real, whatever he says sounds like law or equivalent to force of nature!
However this time you are talking about Richard Farrow and if you knew Ric like I do you wouldn't make such comments...

 

Real

  • Fighting the war on absurdity one foolish idea at a time.
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1693
  • Thanked: 288 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2016, 08:26:06 PM »
Lol
« Last Edit: January 23, 2016, 08:36:14 PM by Real »
 

Trilobite

Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #35 on: January 24, 2016, 09:59:23 AM »
..oh, oh, oh what a gal!
 

december

Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #36 on: January 24, 2016, 10:11:03 AM »
Has anybody noticed how any subject is being interrupted and redirected to the famous empty debate with Mr. Real or some of his satellites or associates?!

No?!

 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

palestis

Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #37 on: January 24, 2016, 03:54:47 PM »
Has anybody noticed how any subject is being interrupted and redirected to the famous empty debate with Mr. Real or some of his satellites or associates?!

No?!
Of course.
That's y I provide real examples, expecting to see an answer based on real examples.
Instead I get answers that points into the same general theories.  Not that all theories are wrong.
What is missing is attention to detail. Theories assume constant betting and same bet amount and same progression style. When a player is free to leave when he wins, that's enough to put serious constrains in every theory.
You don't need a Nobel in math to qualify arguing against gaming experts.
All you need is observations which naturally lead into viable conclusions.

« Last Edit: January 24, 2016, 03:56:48 PM by palestis »
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Real

  • Fighting the war on absurdity one foolish idea at a time.
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1693
  • Thanked: 288 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #38 on: January 24, 2016, 07:25:36 PM »
I'm sorry if you don’t like or understand the facts.
 

jefra

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 9
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #39 on: January 25, 2016, 05:04:27 PM »

 I was playing in a small one called Diamond Club.

No casino with such a name is in Slovenia!?!

Hmmm
 

DrTalos

Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #40 on: January 25, 2016, 06:30:23 PM »
You are right. My mistake. The name was The Gold Club, and the location is at the entry of the Lipica resort and Casino.
  My bad.

 

jefra

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 9
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #41 on: January 25, 2016, 06:55:52 PM »
YES, this is correct!
I was in that casino in last summer. There they have airball machines with same name as casino name.
Dr, Talos, še vedno nevem, kakšne stave vi igrate?? Ali so to direkt številke, sektorji, ali pa zunanje polovi?ne stave?

Lp
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1987
  • Thanked: 351 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #42 on: January 25, 2016, 08:59:16 PM »
YES, this is correct!
I was in that casino in last summer. There they have airball machines with same name as casino name.
Dr, Talos, še vedno nevem, kakšne stave vi igrate?? Ali so to direkt številke, sektorji, ali pa zunanje polovi?ne stave?

Lp

The answer to your questions is that he is betting even chances (low,high,red,black,even,odd) with progression, according to dr Talos his progression makes all the difference.
I think that by now you have all understood that this progression is not a known progression, but his creation.
I understand and respect his decision not to share it.
 

jefra

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 9
Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #43 on: January 25, 2016, 09:27:55 PM »
I doubt he plays even chances.
 

Bebediktus

Re: To all mathematician here
« Reply #44 on: January 25, 2016, 10:01:42 PM »
Quote
I think that by now you have all understood that this progression is not a known progression, but his creation.
Progression is pregression , no mather which it is . You can be many times in plus , but still disperssion of results will do its job sooner or later