well. I , for one use Probability Theory but I dispute that Probability Theory is justification for the certainty that is claimed by the likes of Mike.

I ask him to consider the ACTUAL number of possibilities of a series of 10,000, 100,000 1,000,000 . GAZILLIONS ! The " Alternative Histories "

1 in 37 becomes 1 in 1369 over 2 spins.. Keep multiplying 1369 by itself 500 times and tell me you unreservedly

accept 1- 2 - 100 series of a simulated 1,000,000 spins is PROOF of anything.

When will it be understood that Probability Theory deals with Probabilities and not certainties

Likliehoods . Yes. Proof ? No.

Probability Theory is a help in trying to understand the un- understandable- it does not in itself offer proof. Not that I expect Mike to understand that - he IS a Fundamentalist. Like all Fundamentalists tend to do - he overstates his case.