New Forum Address: ROULETTELIFE.COM
  Update your Bookmarks

Author Topic: .44 Magnum  (Read 9086 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Reyth

Re: .44 Magnum
« Reply #15 on: June 28, 2015, 02:12:56 PM »
Here is a video demonstrating this system:

http://youtu.be/sPWLAgIAhcc
 

Harryj

Re: .44 Magnum
« Reply #16 on: June 28, 2015, 08:30:41 PM »
   Sorry guys this isn't my idea. BA is probably mixing it up with a system I call Sixgun.44. he probably heard about it from Palestis, who he visited recently.

    I will check with Jim to see if he wants to share it. We worked on it together and made some alterations to my origional idea. Jim plays it slightly differently to me, but the basic idea is the same.

     Harry
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1983
  • Thanked: 338 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: .44 Magnum
« Reply #17 on: June 28, 2015, 08:54:45 PM »
   Sorry guys this isn't my idea. BA is probably mixing it up with a system I call Sixgun.44. he probably heard about it from Palestis, who he visited recently.

    I will check with Jim to see if he wants to share it. We worked on it together and made some alterations to my origional idea. Jim plays it slightly differently to me, but the basic idea is the same.

     Harry

Yes,I have confused the magnum44 with the Sixgun44!
By the way,Jim told me about the 3 variations,yours,his and from the Belgian.
 

Reyth

Re: .44 Magnum
« Reply #18 on: June 28, 2015, 09:11:34 PM »
Ok.  Well thanks guys! : D
 

Reyth

Re: .44 Magnum
« Reply #19 on: June 29, 2015, 01:31:12 PM »
Very interesting discovery.  The best odds are gained when in Steps 1 & 5 because 30 numbers are covered.  30 stations have a max loss of 9.  So really, the additional weaker steps only hurt this system since they have a combined max loss of 12; there is no advantage to stringing these steps together.

It is very interesting to learn this.

The best of the steps then is Step 5 because it pays out 2 units instead of just 1.  The chip layout is also inefficient because 2 chips are allocated to straight up bets when they can be put on splits (double the coverage). 

So the updated step 5 is 16 splits, covering 32 numbers and paying out two units per win, -16 on a loss; 0.8648648648648649 chance to win.



(1).7480192204524853

These are now the chances of having only 1 sequential loss.  This is an improvement.

So really the system can be run from a single step (the best step) and obtain better results.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2015, 03:25:50 PM by Reyth »