blockdamofo

Author Topic: Another debate about ramndomness  (Read 1014 times)

0 Members and 32 Guests are viewing this topic.

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2019, 05:11:51 PM »
I suppose you need a roulette computer to win...lol All other types of predictive methods are not good enough but hey, this works for me. Not 100% because trends come in different wave lengths so if you start betting at the end of a wave chances are you will not win that game. There are other aspects I consider in my approach. Remember, roulette is a business to me, not a game. I don't play every spin and am not a gambler. I have a business approach to roulette.

There is no need for me to recruit or sell anything to gamblers because I am very capable of making my money on the roulette tables; legally, so I am not concerned about getting banned. MrPerfect, cozy up to PMS and recruit him into your gang...lol ;D :D ::) :-*
 

MrPerfect.

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2019, 07:41:54 PM »
Mickey,  lm not only Stratege friend, yours as well, you just forgot it.
   I'm not saying that ,what you say you do, will not work. What l say is it needs some extra. .. and this extra is understanding. This type of understanding doesn't come on forums or from books... it's a result of hands on personal experience in studies of roulette wheels.
   You look numbers on the casino card and think you look wheel... there is a picture of the wheel there in the best case. It's not what players look.
 

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2019, 08:12:02 PM »
MrPerfect, I fully understand what I do and how I approach roulette  (as a business). When I play I situate myself to get a clear view of the actual wheel. I watch the wheel not a scorecard picture.

Friend? Your posts are very insulting to me. Instead of having a meaningful discussion you would rather call me stupid, so No, friends I don't think so.
In the past when you ran your VB section we had great conversations and discussions. Even off roulette topics were interesting to discuss with you, but not now.

 

MrPerfect.

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2019, 08:38:25 PM »
Mickey, we come from different backgroungs. .. our culture is different... we are different people.
  In my culture, the one who is tolking truth with you is your friend.
  Simple example. .. your girl, wife..  got other guy and someone you know sou it. What you will expect from real friend? I will expect such a person to tell me truth without worrying about hurt my feelings...
   Here is same. You are cheeted by your brain, l just tell you truth. I know, no one in your anglosax  culture like a truth, but l do not care about it. I prefer to tell you truth, instead of caring about your feelings. 
  Any doubts? Isn't it in your culture to say lying a norm? When someone asks how are you, don't you say " everything fine, thanks" and smile? I have never seen a normal person without problems. ....
 

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #19 on: October 05, 2019, 08:55:13 PM »
Really???? Hahahaha  ::) ::) ::) :o ;D
 

MrPerfect.

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #20 on: October 06, 2019, 07:25:28 AM »
Really,  Mickey.
 

Bebediktus

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #21 on: October 06, 2019, 08:19:14 AM »
Really mostly aim of talks in forums is to show how good are  talker.

Many years back I had quite big group , not know how them to name , say folowers which played roulette. We all writed in different forums and saw that mostly that is empty talks. But we all wanted that talks will be with some sense , that they will be not only talks but discussions about something.

And thinked how that to do . Was different minds. I will tel about mine.

When we enter to forum we  must register then login. So login after go automated. So mine mind was such - instead automated login when entering forum player  must  do few bets on virtual roulette say 10. And after it enter forum  and near his nick is his result  which he got in this entry and the same all his history. So every forum member always have  his like rating - how good they bet.Not need talks and arguings who is who and how good understanding about game have - all is clear from that rating.Done survey and found that peoples not like to know that their rating :)

Then I created game - roulette but where two players can play each against other like in chess. Again nobody want to play...
Conclusion is such - peoples afraid to know truth about their level in roulette... :)
 

Stratege

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2019, 09:34:29 AM »


@ Mickey, there is no connection between 20 past spin results and posterior 20 spin results. Anything you see , it's just that, patterns that have no statistical bearing.

The friend Mr. Perfect said again a very accurate thing, there is no link between 20 rounds and the next 20 of MickyPerterPan, in the context cited. Also, taking 8 numbers of a dozen has no concrete meaning. It's almost taking a double street, and this has no logic on 20 spins. MickyPeterP implicitly asserts that there is a "pruner theory" that can win. So, when MPP says that for him, it's the basis of a few methods, we will understand the end result of his imaginary "enterprise". :o

To better inform MPP, I do not play on the color but on the formation of a pattern, no matter the color. But, I don’t expect 20 spins (that would be ridiculous), it's rather 20 x 20 spins (so that several types of differences coincide). ;D
« Last Edit: October 06, 2019, 09:38:48 AM by Stratege »
 

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2019, 11:03:30 AM »
What does the word pattern suggest? A pattern suggests recurring or repeating events. How do we discover patterns? We do this with statistical research. Through this research we are able to determine the recurring frequency of identified patterns.

Trends or patterns are identified in large sequence samples that also reveal the recurring frequency of such trends or patterns. When betting on 8 or 12 numbers patterns are a lot more compact and can be identified in very small sequence samples, like 20 numbers for example. Critical analysis is required and to benefit from this it is imperative that the player structure his play strategically and not rely on a straight forward mechanical approach.
 

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2019, 11:21:44 AM »
PMS, as a BJ specialist (I'm taking about Blackjack here) you can suck as much as you want but you will never suck the marrow from my bone...lol ::)  I have given enough pointers for any thinking player to take what I have shared and TEST IT so they can individually craft a meaningful use of the information in their specific approach to making money from roulette.
 

Stratege

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2019, 02:03:52 PM »
It is very curious that a member, who does not have a scientific background, uses many words or phrases from research and statistics. MickyPerterPan is simply a literary man who tries his pen, this feather, on the forums, his peacock feather! Narcissistic animal without equal!

Has he ever taken a statistics course to say that? No ! Has he ever taken courses in epistemology? No ! Has he ever done research in a field other than roulette? No ! So, how can he know how scientific research is being done? He should not use too many words he found on the forums. It gives importance but, finally, it's wind, they are hollow words. Which members understood how to win roulette with his "science of words"? He invents here students who have succeeded! He should publish a novel in the genre "science fiction".
« Last Edit: October 06, 2019, 02:09:17 PM by Stratege »
 

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #26 on: October 06, 2019, 02:17:42 PM »
Hahaha.... PMS, you remind me so much of Tickey the Clown with his brightly coloured face and yellow hair. In recent years clowns have been used in horror movies but I think you are harmless; angry but harmless...lol  ::) ;D
 

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #27 on: October 06, 2019, 04:25:44 PM »
PMS, as your narcissistic animal without equal I'd like you to study  this randomly selected video
and see if your blood pressure goes up a little or a lot. The final words of the video might give you hope.
https://youtu.be/sZyzdrAw6Pk
 

Stratege

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #28 on: October 07, 2019, 09:18:59 AM »
MickyP stats:
Total Posts: 2781 posts.

Total Topics Started: 142 topics.

Yes, I appear to be all over the place.

Is this not what the forum was designed for?
I am proud

So, MickyPeacock is proud to talk about his 2800 peacock feathers! the purpose of a forum is to post useful and intelligent things. For MickyPeacock, quantity is important. Another idiocy, because "too much information kills information".

Members are leaving this forum little by little because its quality is declining from month to month. Personally, I was attacked too much by MickyParanoid, so I don't want to develop my very technical discussions (too technical for MickyPeacock, it prevented his feathers from doing the complete wheel). Other members who have potential come less often.

Who has done an analysis on this phenomenon and can give a thoughtful explanation (an ego story cannot explain everything)?
« Last Edit: October 07, 2019, 09:23:19 AM by Stratege »
 

MickyP

Re: Another debate about ramndomness
« Reply #29 on: October 07, 2019, 10:22:56 AM »
Glad to see the video worked for you PMS. I see you have calmed down to a mild rage with no over the top insults, only petty name calling. Good for you Stratege, I'm glad this free therapy session had a positive effect on you.  ;D