I've been looking at the clues Vaddi left about his holy grail method, to see if I could crack it. I'm not sure if what I've found is what he used but early indications are good.

Vaddi was clear that phase 1 is to bet on the last number to hit, then the last 2 and so on up to 8. However he also referenced pairs, saying that balance is key to the method. He said when singles are hitting, we're there and when repeaters are hitting, we're there. His pairs were 0-1, 1-2, 2-3 etc up to 36-0.

What I've noticed is, if we bet on both the landed number AND it's pair, then the next number and it's pair, wins are happening all the time by the 9th spin. Often sooner.

Im not one who knows how to test over a large number of spins, so if anyone can that would be great. I've run through manually about 500 numbers (live dealer) and every sequence has hit except one that didn't hit until the 11th spin. However it's a small sample.

So let's be clear how it works:

6 hits.

We bet on 6 and 7

31 hits

We bet 6,7,31,32

20 hits

We bet 6,7,31,32,20,21

19 hits

As per Vaddi, because 20 is already in play we pair 19 with 18 instead.

So keep doing this until 16 numbers are covered or you win and are in a new high profit.

Ok so if anyone can test this over large spin outcomes that'd be great.

IF after extended testing we are seeing a high volume of wins by the 9th betting spin (so after 8 losses you bet the last 8 numbers plus pairs, rather than increasing any further) then we are on to something, but need to work out the best wagering strategy. Clearly flat betting will see losses if wins come after the 5th bet (by this point 30 units are gone and the next bet requires 12 units). But progression would get way out of hand.

If it produces consistently though, there will be a staking plan to best manage this over time and ensure long term profits.

Be interested to hear your thoughts!