Author Topic: Calling RouletteMan  (Read 1566 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MrPerfect.

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #45 on: June 26, 2019, 05:40:45 PM »
Scepticus,  even if your blocks are fine and maybe working for something.... you spent so much time making a secret out of it that no one consider it serious anymore.
 

Rinad

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #46 on: June 26, 2019, 05:57:26 PM »


    reading Juice's posts should tell us something.

we play roulette very much the same way we approche life, as a mirror to our character.
I deeply appreciate he is sharing some tools on how he is able to beat the game. and i told him before that is something anyone should be proud of.

but having said that I also appreciate the fact that he is not afraid to share the days where he had made mistakes and had to paid dearly for it, just like we all do.

but one thing i take from it is the following;   He was able to quickly learn from it and re-invent a new path or different way in order to win. like the "annuity" concept.
a hard concept to accept for 99%  of the players.
like politicians many want the power and money RIGHT NOW.
 I had to set-back and re-evaluate my game often and still do. 
we all want a winning system ,BUT ARE ONLY WILLING TO ACCEPT IT IF PACKAGED A CERTAIN WAY.

so that is what must be the change.  our view. we have learned from media and others that it is "easy money".

sorry, like a Art form, every chords played must synchronized themselves in order to show the final product.

a hit song. a winning formula. yes a mirror to the way we live our lives.

Rinad
 
The following users thanked this post: palestis, scepticus, juice

MrPerfect.

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #47 on: June 26, 2019, 06:17:05 PM »
Rinad,  unfortunately there is only one way playing roulette properly - betting on numbers that come up.
   When play we should forget who we are and what we think and just follow what it does.  In this respect roulette is like market,  no point to force your opinion on it, if you follow,  you make money, if you opose - you lose. Roulette is stronger.
 
The following users thanked this post: Rinad

Rinad

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #48 on: June 26, 2019, 07:08:51 PM »


  Mr Perfect, nothing could be more true. following is much more beneficial then speculate something is going to change on our watch.
we all know numbers will change but claiming we can forecast when, can be so dangerous if we begin raising our bets. like buying "option contracts" and I read how people make hundreds of thousands but they dont tell you when they get taken to the cleaner and have to work at a day Job from now on.
perhaps we sometime lose sens of reality. then reality remind us in a painfull way that we should not ask for what we cant have right now. (old chinese proverb).

R.
 
The following users thanked this post: MrPerfect.

scepticus

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #49 on: June 26, 2019, 07:37:29 PM »
Scepticus,  even if your blocks are fine and maybe working for something.... you spent so much time making a secret out of it that no one consider it serious anymore.
On the contrary, Mr Perfect  I did not make a secret of it  . It is still there for anyone to manipulate. Perhaps I did not explain it properly and that resulted in my frustration. I think it is clear - others didn't but  why shoiuld I be blamed because others cannot understand it ?
It guarantees 3 correct wins in 4 spins. That is a solid base from which to work.  End of !
 

Joe

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #50 on: June 26, 2019, 07:41:52 PM »
It guarantees 3 correct wins in 4 spins.
Could there be 3 incorrect wins in 3 spins?  ;D
But seriously, how many numbers do you bet?

 

MrPerfect.

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #51 on: June 26, 2019, 09:16:35 PM »
Scepticus,  speaking openly. ..
   There are ways to play outside bets for profit. Need to find conditions when this way of play is profitable,  but it requires such an accuracy and dedication to find them .... it's not worth the effort. Much better to bet on numbers without all this pain... but it's physics. 
   Now... say statistically that red is due because there were red or black or any other combination of them before. .. it's just not correct. You or anyone else will never find reliable trigger for it. Outside group of numbers ( 18) can not be limited statistically due to its random nature. Red or black is a random positions scattered all around the wheel. They alternate with interval of 1 position. Same as we can not reliably predict exact position of number with accuracy that compensate other 17 numbers, we can not predict red or black.
    You are free to think the way you want, but it's planty of places offering good money for working mathematics roulette system. If you think you got one, submit it and get recompense money.
   
 

scepticus

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #52 on: June 26, 2019, 11:12:32 PM »
It guarantees 3 correct wins in 4 spins.
Could there be 3 incorrect wins in 3 spins?  ;D
But seriously, how many numbers do you bet?
Joe
you need to understand the concept of  Sets of Three.Dozens are sets of three-  Columns are sets of three'  two DS whichnmake a total of 7 ar sets of three So they  can be used in any of these .
Here I am talking about Dozens - because they can  be cheaper to bet than columns and so less outlay.
Can there be 3 incorrect ? Yes but they are contained in a setof 4 so not necessarily consecutive.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2019, 11:17:51 PM by scepticus »
 

scepticus

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #53 on: June 26, 2019, 11:15:35 PM »
Mr Perfect
Palestis said some time ago that he would not reveal a truly profitable method . I agreed then - and still do for what I think are obvius reasons.
 

Bebediktus

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #54 on: June 27, 2019, 01:48:58 PM »

Laurance Scott.

“  I don’t think I would be so successful on today ‘ s wheels.

..........................
Christopher Pawlicki

When talking about a particular wheel said “ these wheels are seductive  but dangerous for the Advantage player …. They are optimised for random play not predictive play and random play achieves the casino’s mathematical edge “.

This two mans I know - with both talked. Laurance continue play and wins and sometimes quite big , but he like to talk something how all is bad :).

Pawlicki is not player at all, so not professional player , he is more like reporter, or writer.... He know Larry , know  several other good players like  Stanford Won  , blackjack and craps player, the same Lo Riggio ( Dominator ), writed with them several books, but he is not player...
 

Bebediktus

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #55 on: June 27, 2019, 02:02:51 PM »
Really read what you here post  and not understand about what is arguing ? About which method is better or about at all if possible to beat wheel ?

If about last  - then all is easy - only you must answer - why ball stops in one pocket but not in another - what efect to it that he so do  ? :)
If you will find answer - all for you will become clear :)
 

Re: Calling RouletteMan
« Reply #56 on: June 28, 2019, 05:55:30 AM »
Hi,

Sorry for not logging in. Ofcourse I'm open and willing to discuss the content of our videos.
If you have comments please post them in the comments section of the videos or even here and we will try to reply.

Btw, we just published a new video about the Regression Up and Pull strategy. A little known but very smart approach to Simple Chances betting. Also good for Baccarat. Check out our channel
youtu.be/9e1c8A4ss5U
 
The following users thanked this post: MickyP, Third