Author Topic: sceptictank versus the world  (Read 1463 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mako

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2019, 06:54:03 PM »
I'm not sure people reading the thread have identified how to play it 100%.  I know you feel it's accurate and close enough to learn from scep, but as an example, look at Palestis' Single Dozen thread...we had dozens of players testing and reporting back on how it worked or not over time.  But in your thread there aren't many results as Micky mentions...I think you need to take a risk and detail it a bit more?
 
The following users thanked this post: MickyP

scepticus

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2019, 08:03:54 PM »
Mako

mako

I am not a maths geek and i understood  it's potential right away . That  may have been because I have some knowledge of gambling maths . I am puzzled as to why others don't .

If you read through the thread you will see that I have tried to explain it many times so I am not going to go there again .  I have offered to  take you through it and answer any questions you may have . I think that is fair enough .

Palestis thread ? Jim has posted a number of ideas in this forum. Only for others to put their own " take " on it ."  Why so many engage with Palestis ? Quite simply, this is a forum populated with Progression Bettors and I am not one .   Petrhaps you are ? I prefer Flat Betting but have said that there  may be merit in a 1 step or 2 step progression but no more than that . Preferably positive progressions- much cheaper ! . Incidentally both Palestis and Dobbelsteen seem tohave   lessened their Negative Progressions so , perhaps , they now see the wisdom of my approach .

And, frankly , your heading doesn't inspire confidence  in your " impartial " desire to learn .
I have said that I was prepared to meet any of my critics in a B&M casino . No one was willing to put their Super Duper Professiinal method to the test . Solaris tested it and found it  a viable method . What has MickyP shown ? Nothhig  worthwhile and you should know that he is a  prolific arguer and not just with me but with quite a few others .

Incidentally, in which country do you reside ? 
« Last Edit: February 21, 2019, 08:10:10 PM by scepticus »
 
The following users thanked this post: Mako

MickyP

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #17 on: February 21, 2019, 08:52:47 PM »
Septic, I challenge what others post mostly to get clarity on issues but when I ask one of those hard uncomfortable questions and I'm answered with a smug remark then I turn up the heat a bit; slowly but surely the heat increases. You are familiar with the boiling a frog story aren't you?

You claim I know nothing about the game yet I am able to debate anyone including some of the top dogs. Check out some of the top dog "fights" I've had and maybe just maybe you will pick up that the best learning curve is to challenge what the masses simply accept out of fear. I have learnt a great deal by pushing issues to get a deeper understanding of the game.

This thread was dedicated to you; be thankful unless you realize what it means.
I'll spell it out for you. You are so stuck in your ways and this is as a result of all the BS you produce. You are stuck in your own BS that resembles a septic tank and you just keep adding more and more to it. You can't swim in it but maybe you can float in it.
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #18 on: February 21, 2019, 08:54:14 PM »
Scep' s  roulette strategies .  (Read 133317 times)
SMUG ?  Look in  the mirror Mickyboy  !
« Last Edit: February 21, 2019, 08:56:25 PM by scepticus »
 

MickyP

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #19 on: February 21, 2019, 08:58:03 PM »
If you want to intimidate me with the number then at least add a zero or two to it.  ;D
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #20 on: February 21, 2019, 09:12:03 PM »
If you want to intimidate me with the number then at least add a zero or two to it.  ;D

 :D :D :D :D :D :D
Riled you didn't it !  :D :D :D
Keep posting and we might get there !  ;D ;D
 
 

scepticus

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #21 on: February 22, 2019, 12:38:23 PM »
" You claim I know nothing about the game yet I am able to debate anyone including some of the top dogs. Check out some of the top dog "fights" I've had "

Yup  ! " Fights " seem to be one of your  main purpose here . Obviously , I am NOT one your  " Top Dogs " but who do you mean by the  Top Dogs  ?
" I'll spell it out for you. You are so stuck in your ways and this is as a result of all the BS you produce. You are stuck in your own BS that resembles a septic tank and you just keep adding more and more to it. You can't swim in it but maybe you can float in it. "

Intellectually bankrupt  !

" This thread was dedicated to you; be thankful unless you realize what it means. "
 ???
To me it means  " An Insult " 
« Last Edit: February 22, 2019, 12:40:50 PM by scepticus »
 

mr j

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #22 on: February 22, 2019, 02:27:09 PM »
Can you go 24 hours without arguing with anyone please?

Ken
 
The following users thanked this post: MickyP

scepticus

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #23 on: February 22, 2019, 05:18:12 PM »
Can you go 24 hours without arguing with anyone please?

Ken
Whom do I argue with , Ken ?   Apart from you and  Micky P .?  IT takes two to argue so why don't you and Michael take your advice  and stop inviting argument with your posts - such as your above PREJUDICED post . Why do you keep giving Micky P " Thanks " when he attacks me ?   
« Last Edit: February 22, 2019, 05:19:49 PM by scepticus »
 

Greek

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #24 on: February 22, 2019, 05:28:38 PM »
"While the original idea is not mine these are my own version and  they do fit the bill. Later I’ll post ideas on how we can use these - and you can concoct your own.
                                   THE  NINE COLUMN BLOCKS"

I am curious. The original idea is not yours. Please give credit to whom you had taken the idea from.
 

scepticus

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #25 on: February 22, 2019, 05:58:15 PM »
Greek
I have prevously given credit in the thread  Scep's Roulette  Strategies . It was by a Football / Soccer  Pool firm away back in the 1940's / 1950s .

It is really just a mathematical chart ( ? ) which deal with ANY " Sets of Three "  . Football resut -  Home Win _ Away Win - Draw - The Dozens and Columns in Roulette -  The  possile results of 4 Three Horse Races.   Frankly , i am puzzled as to why some  members don't understand it . Apart from " Not  Interested "  which is fair enough !
I think I win the prize for the most replies of " Rubbish "   :D
 

mr j

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #26 on: February 22, 2019, 07:50:06 PM »
"Whom do I argue with , Ken ?   Apart from you and  Micky P ?" >> Nice try. There are/were at least five.
 

scepticus

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #27 on: February 22, 2019, 08:35:19 PM »
Mr J
NOW - I think just you and Michael
THEN- Some more - Yes . But ALL of them because they rubbished the Blocks without giving a valid reason . They attack me but I am not allowed to attack them ? Good thinking Batman  !
We are supposed  to be discussing roulette in this forum so why did  Micky P mention the word " liberal " . The only reason I can see is that he is trying to provoke one of his " fights .

btw Do you think that you are one of the  Big Beasts he claims to have quarrelled  with ?
 

mr j

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2019, 09:17:29 PM »
"They attack me but I am not allowed to attack them?" >> "THEY",,,,,,,thats fine, more than two, as I stated.
 

Greek

Re: sceptictank versus the world
« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2019, 09:20:56 PM »
Greek
I have prevously given credit in the thread  Scep's Roulette  Strategies . It was by a Football / Soccer  Pool firm away back in the 1940's / 1950s .

It is really just a mathematical chart ( ? ) which deal with ANY " Sets of Three "  . Football resut -  Home Win _ Away Win - Draw - The Dozens and Columns in Roulette -  The  possile results of 4 Three Horse Races.   Frankly , i am puzzled as to why some  members don't understand it . Apart from " Not  Interested "  which is fair enough !
I think I win the prize for the most replies of " Rubbish "   :D

Thanks for the reply. I understand how it works. I guess if someone wants to play this way, good for them. It's not my cup of tea. So, players should not be quick to criticize. It's just another method used by players that appreciate a different approach.