Royal Panda roulette

Author Topic: 6 Pence System  (Read 2890 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Stratege

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #30 on: February 13, 2019, 03:18:06 PM »

Giajjenno, 2 people called a dyad, a group of 3 people is called a triad (especially in psychosociology analysis of small groups). So much for your understanding and see that this word "triad" is more correct than saying "absurd" (according to your expression).

Then I do not see what I can thank in this triad. I will not repeat what kind of behavior they are usually. Read in detail their latest posts (especially in "roulette is unbeatable") and you will understand the intolerance they show. You say that you do not have experience with roulette, and I will not use that for your lack of consideration. Perhaps you expect something from this triad to gain years of research? If that's it, you'll wait a long time for nothing. Then think about reading one of my last posts about it in "roulette is unbeatable". But also read again my message above, because I say that the knowledge of the triad is also on other forums and in the heads of some members here. So, it's a common knowledge and only beginners can be impressed. But see, they say some ideas but never anecdote about the discovery of their ideas (because it comes from elsewhere, another forum?).

You say, "But everybody can join the group, and members will follow you." I am for equality between people, I can promote reflection and others can do that too. But do not accept members who attack others because they want to destroy initiatives. To give one's opinion (even contrary to others) on roulette is normal. What isn't normal is when it turns into criticism of people, and then the violent words arrive.

I am very calm, and this forum is not my life (rather observe the meaning of my initiative to fight brutality, it is an altruistic work). I suppose the little contradictions in your speech show concern about something. Could you talk about it ? Sometimes tidying up a forum is necessary, otherwise experienced players who want pleasant exchanges will leave. It's this process of starting the experienced that leaves other beginner members alone and without stimulating communications. In my country, 3 roulette forums have closed in 5 months, mainly because the long quarrels have left the old, so the new players have nothing to say and the forum dies slowly and closes for lack of activity.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2019, 03:25:08 PM by Stratege »
 

GIAJJENNO

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #31 on: February 13, 2019, 04:58:41 PM »
This forum is about posting 3 4 members often, and 5 6 other just sometimes, and others just read these posts. It is boring to read all over the same posts, expect sometimes I see news. And this not means that I have learnt nlthing from these posts. I learnt, thanks for them, what I can do is to follow other roulette forums maybe I can found my way to consistently winning, because I try, try, but until now every method, systemy what I discervered, what orhers sent to me, what I did with them with tweaks, every failed one after one like dominos. Who have consistebtly winning strategy, everybody knows, that he will never share in forums, and he has right, he must do this, and he is not selfish, just he dont wanna help to others, its fine, or he just wanna inspirate members to create own way.

Creating consistently winnning strategy is maybe easy for someone, for me is very hard, I cant imagine how should this strategy looks like, and I am afraid I will die so, that I will never know that feeling, but I continue to read, impact, test, think something different way, test it, tweak it, but I feel little bit lonely with this, cause I not speak about roulette with no one, and a little help always helps. What I have help is these in the forums, nothing more mate, and thats fine, I cant wish more, I have arms, I have eyes, which I can test, so be calm boys, be calm.

I must say, that from November I am in very sick condition, I was couple of times in hospital, because docrtors cant solve the problem, what my body do since November. I often cryied in evenings, I prayed not to get well, but not to wake up, I have so bad evenings.

But its only my business, and I dont wanna say more about this, just it, that when I was a little bit better condition, I read the forums posts, I tested in paper, in notebook via live spins, ai continued my work, because my one of my dream is to beat the roulette, and I give my biggest respect to others, who beat it all day all night. You are a winner ! 🙂👌
 
The following users thanked this post: Jake007, Third

Stratege

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #32 on: February 13, 2019, 06:47:26 PM »

Giajjenno, sorry for your very complex personal situation! Try to find a maximum of emotional and social supports. The support of others brings about 30% efficiency to overcome a problem.

You say that there are only 3 or 4 members who post regularly. If the relationship climate was better the members would post more. Some fear unnecessary criticism, it does not promote commitment, questions, proposals for answers, so the development of knowledge.

Look for a winning method to roulette is actually meeting a lot of failures for years. It is distressing with each failure; the players then live quite lastingly in a psychic state of sadness. When we have found, we quickly forget those years of worry, and beginners remind us of what we experienced (that's fine). Many players live for 10, 20 or 30 years of uncertainty or their entire life. The passionate player (and loser) loses 3 types of resources: his time, his health, his money. Be careful, "Lady roulette" can be a devouring passion.

Players looking for a method usually do not know that it takes a quasi-attitude of scientific researcher to find something. Amateurism regularly leads to failure, everyone has had this experience, but how can one no longer be an amateur researcher?

In another topic I started to talk about "parasitic variables" that prevent finding a solution. These parasitic factors prevent the researcher from building a coherent experiment. There are mainly 3 parasitic factors for us. 1) we must not want to find but learn to look 2) we must not want to gain (a benefit) but observe favorable phenomena 3) we must not think of the practice when we seek but adapt to the real context our discoveries. The first factor is that learning to search is becoming structured and each testing becomes a rewarding experience, even if we did not find a winning method. This experience will be useful for other studies. I observe on the forums that players have difficulty accumulating experiences, they do not learn enough lessons from a test, so they make the same mistakes sometimes for years. The second factor means that if we are blinded by profit, we will not see the particular phenomena in roulette numbers, and we will never build solid because without identifying phenomena we remain in complete randomness. The third factor means that we have to forget the game's framework to give us limitless (or almost) thinking. Adapting the theory to practice is another study to be done next. If we do not respect this framework, we will test ideas too simple and directly related to a comfortable practice of the game (beware of shortcuts and the search for comfort).

Studying authors allows you to follow instructions and test, but in case of failure, other authors have taught us techniques and we try to improve a method. Our experience grows and we discover things, we invent techniques too, because working reveals our potentialities, and we end up finding (phenomena that we exploit with techniques). Arrived at this level, roulette is no longer a misadventure but a great adventure.  ;)
« Last Edit: February 13, 2019, 06:55:15 PM by Stratege »
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO, Third

MrPerfect.

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #33 on: February 13, 2019, 07:02:33 PM »
Gia,  if you want money at this game, you have to create advantage somehow. Look what casinos did. They created House Edge mathematical way via unfair payment.  To overcome it you need to be right in your bets more often then probability dictates. Advantage play is only reliable way to do so.
   To read about it there are few good autors:
 1. Jafco/ master roulette..  l would read both...
2. Edward Thorp
3. Caleb Johnson.
   You can check out my vb section on this forum as well.
   It's if you want "easy life".
  Good luck.
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO, rimsky

Stratege

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #34 on: February 13, 2019, 08:00:29 PM »

Third, sorry to have been off topic on your discussion but some detours are sometimes essential to continue calmly.
I have a question. Your graphics presented last night, I do not understand them. Can you bring a text to explain all this ? Thank you.
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

rimsky

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #35 on: February 13, 2019, 08:12:32 PM »

@giajjenno

Totally agreed with Mr. Perfect.

Also, dismiss once for all things you know can't work even if you like them. You know they eventually don't work, forget them.

I'd say focus on straight ups strategies. Find what fits with yourself. Follow the wheel, forget the layout. Search for a statistical edge. You need patience. Grind. Push strong when things go good. Consider regression as a possible MM tool.

And never, never surrender.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2019, 08:19:04 PM by rimsky »
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO, MickyP

Third

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #36 on: February 13, 2019, 11:46:08 PM »
Wow Gia, sorry had no idea you have been in ill health.  Prayers your way. 

The basic Talos principles are the best way to approach roulette that I have yet found:

1) Bet as many numbers as possible while keeping the bets as low as possible but also as balanced as possible
1a) Not too low or our winnings will not be enough to recover the ever growing debt
1b) Not too high or our losses will require too large of a bankroll to win

Talos suggests achieving this is by using a divisor associated with a ratio of hits:spins. 

When you hit failure (rare but it exists), you need to fight to figure out ways to tweak things to allow you to go farther.  Failure is a gateway to becoming more adept at survival and achieving profit.

 
The following users thanked this post: Jake007, GIAJJENNO, vitorwally, rimsky, Stratege

MickyP

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #37 on: February 14, 2019, 07:46:31 AM »
Michael
I think you err in claiming  that" Playing straight up numbers is better than reducing them to splits. Economy is not always an advantage."
If you disagree then perhaps you would be kind enough to explain why straight - ups are better than splits.
Yours faithfully...scepticus

One unit on a straight up number vs one unit (same value) on a split.... Come on Scepticus!
35-1 vs 17-1

I see Stratege is the forums local shrink as well as the founder of the triad and through all of this including his rape of the English language he did say one thing that holds truth and this truth is that nothing new is being presented on the forum. However, there are new ways of using info that already exists and through this new methods of play are being created.

Gisjjenno,  sorry to hear about your health. You do not have to worry about the "triad" spreading seeds of evil because there is no triad.
I have always asked fellow players to put to the test everything I say and have also always encouraged other to create and master their own game.
I have started many threads and asked some difficult questions as well as some stupid question not for my benefit but for others who are afraid to ask such questions. I question and challenge what others say or present and I feel it's the right approach.
I am not afraid  of Stratege and his better than thou attitude. He has an inflated ego and this is normally the result of an inferiority complex.he needs recognition and I'm not helping by paying attention to him.
Anyway I just had to respond to the liberals.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2019, 07:51:00 AM by MickyP »
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO

Third

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #38 on: February 14, 2019, 07:47:07 AM »
The greatest skill in roulette gambling, which is taught by many winning systems, can only be learned by playing out the spins with personal risk involved. 

This skill involves learning how to size one's bets in the way that The Art of War indicates:
Quote
The general who is skilled in defense hides in the most secret recesses of the earth; he who is skilled in attack flashes forth from the topmost heights of heaven. Thus on the one hand we have ability to protect ourselves; on the other, a victory that is complete.

The proper timing in applying defense and attack is complete victory.

« Last Edit: February 14, 2019, 08:19:35 AM by Third »
 
The following users thanked this post: vitorwally, MickyP, Stratege

scepticus

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #39 on: February 14, 2019, 08:33:42 AM »

" One unit on a straight up number vs one unit (same value) on a split.... Come on Scepticus!
35-1 vs 17-1 "

 So, Michael , this makes betting a straight up " BETTER" than a split ? 

Have  you considreed Risk and Reward ?

Keep your spirits up Gia. Life can be a bitch sometimes !  Otherwise it would be EASY   :D
« Last Edit: February 14, 2019, 08:38:34 AM by scepticus »
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO

Stratege

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #40 on: February 14, 2019, 08:41:47 AM »

Third

Sun Tzu's "The Art of War" is one of my favorite books. It is a profound philosophy when he says "The supreme art of war is to submit without fighting". I also like the quote that we must not persecute individuals, otherwise it would be the worst kind of opponents, and 10 opponents of this kind are worth 100 men. There is also "The 36 Chinese stratagems" that can be found on the internet.

Stratege
« Last Edit: February 14, 2019, 08:43:28 AM by Stratege »
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

MickyP

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #41 on: February 14, 2019, 10:24:13 AM »
Scepticus if a player neglects risk/reward in their initial preparation in developing an approach to the game then you have a loser in the making.
Risk reward is a key ingrediant in the development of any system, strategy and/or method.
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

rimsky

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #42 on: February 14, 2019, 12:14:30 PM »
Quote from: Third link=topic=2695.msg44304#msg44304 date=1549883698[b
][/b]

My adaptation follows:

Identify the 4 hottest numbers from the entire observed session; at least 2 hits within 37 spins each and the highest hit total.  Identify the hottest DS, not including the 4 hottest numbers; the highest hit total thus available. Begin play with these numbers.
 

rimsky

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #43 on: February 14, 2019, 12:16:13 PM »
There are sessions wherein lots of numbers hit twice within 37 spins, and this sessions generally go on showing a quite equal distribution between numbers. It means that focusing on few "hottest" (for example the first two/three which hit twice) is less performing, because there are lots of them coming out spin after spin. And very often this tendency keeps on for several spins. I noticed that in these sessions we could focus on a mix of uniques and sleepers, instead.
I think the best sessions for chasing few hottest straight ups is when few numbers (2 or 3) strongly outnumber the others. I always wait these numbers to hit three times in a cycle of 37 spins before pick them up.

I would not implement any DS in this strategy. DS are actually a fake selection, because they exist only on the layout. Rather, besides of few hottest straight ups, I would bet an equivalent sector of the wheel. The hottest? Maybe not. Because if you pay attention, most of the time, the wheel's flow combines hot and cold numbers spun. Then, besides the hottest, I would look at sleepers.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2019, 12:19:20 PM by rimsky »
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

scepticus

Re: 6 Pence System
« Reply #44 on: February 14, 2019, 02:19:15 PM »
Scepticus if a player neglects risk/reward in their initial preparation in developing an approach to the game then you have a loser in the making.
Risk reward is a key ingrediant in the development of any system, strategy and/or method.
Michael

" One unit on a straight up number vs one unit (same value) on a split.... Come on Scepticus!
35-1 vs 17-1 "

Your claim  did NOT consider Risk and Reward so you were wrong to claim that one was BETTER than the other  . Why  don't you understand that  ?