Author Topic: New idea (not mine)  (Read 3441 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

petespin

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2019, 07:15:12 PM »
I l try to explain what I meant , a long ago I didn't belive that there will be a " static bet " ( to bet on every spin , no trigger required) which wins consistently ,  now I know I was wrong , on the other hand  I can clearly see that it doesnt required a very big br to beat roulette , for me 150u  is enough , after all this guy turbo was right!
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

jerome26b

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2019, 12:01:08 AM »
150 units right it’s my session bankroll now i can lose it sometimes but i know it will win more than loose at the end in the strategy i play. Anyway i don’t pretend victory yet i’ve still to consistent play it and see after 6 months one year what it can do. I’m just stucked now on this theoretical winning system i applied in all my spins history. What i like very much is the fact 150 units is quite low and can be raised easily with time. 
 
The following users thanked this post: MickyP, Third

petespin

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2019, 01:48:18 PM »
The biggest drawdown I had till now was 50u thus 1/3 of my  lifetime br I also have to point out that in that session i had a loss of 14u , and at the previous session I had win 203u !btw the average fluctuate of 150 - 200 u  and also I 'll not stay for long time , most of the time I need a couple of hours of play at a irballs , the most quick hit was 203 u in 11 spins!
 

Third

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2019, 02:22:06 PM »
@Pete: You have said that you bet continuously which is great but I don't think you have mentioned about what you do to observe the output prior to playing?
 

petespin

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #19 on: January 25, 2019, 02:43:51 PM »
What do I observe? I can't say ....sorry , but i ve to tell u that not long ago I was thinking that no static bet could beat roulette , I was .....wrong, so much wrong .
 

Third

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2019, 02:45:26 PM »
Which advice from Turbo inspired you?
 

petespin

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2019, 02:51:01 PM »
Turbo 've said that in fact triggers are useless , I was very doubt full when first hear it , now I know he was right .
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

Third

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2019, 03:23:43 PM »
I have been thinking of putting singles in a matrix because I have noticed they are like my own private felt but what i don't understand is how you divide those into 8 sections which does not fit on either European or American wheels and doesn't even fit if you make the zero its own section?
 

petespin

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2019, 04:49:47 PM »
Matrix idea is really good but first u have to test the wide of a matrix ...the wide is more important .
 

MickyP

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #24 on: January 25, 2019, 05:12:22 PM »
Turbo 've said that in fact triggers are useless , I was very doubt full when first hear it , now I know he was right .

Some players have developed a reputation as being on the mark (being good players) and they have offered sound advice on how best to approach the game. Turbo is one such player but his approach is not a gospel that suits all players. This goes for all players of substance; they are right in the context of their game approach.

Triggers come in different forms and there are many methods that rely on triggers. These same trigger reliant methods do bring home the bacon.
Because I don't fully make use of AP techniques should I openly say the techniques are worthless? At this point they are worthless to me because I can not fully utilize them to my advantage as I have not mastered the techniques. Triggers are no different, they are used in conjunction with an understanding of the trends of the game.
If you decide to play a few numbers in the second dozen, say 4 numbers and start betting immediately, the chances of loss will surface if that dozen falls asleep for the next 15-20 spins. Triggers are a tool that are used as a guide to remain within probability. There is no magic to triggers but I can tell you one thing, anyone using triggers will not bet on a sleeping dozen for 20 spins. Just this small fact alone gives credibility to the use of triggers.

I try and keep my approach to roulette as grounded as possible. I think rationally and apply logic to how I play. Palestis is a strong minded player and he has given countless practical examples of actual play where triggers have been used. In these examples he has proved that triggers do work and that it is possible to show profit from understanding game trends.This is where virtual play strings out a forming or changing trend.
Do the many posts by Palestis proving that Triggers work count for nothing?

It's easy to follow the so called big guns, latch onto and repeat what they say. It will make you look good for a while but it will not make you a profitable player. So much of what the big guns say can not be explained or even debated by themselves. They simply repeat the one liners over and over again. I make a point of researching some of these one liners so I can understand the strong stance taken in defence of them by the big guns. ONLY if I discover that the message in a one liner is beneficial to the way I play roulette will I incorporate it into my approach.

 
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

petespin

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #25 on: January 25, 2019, 05:27:59 PM »
Of course there are many players that their systems based  in a kind of triggers ,and do it sucsesfully , no doubt about it , but let me ask u if u have to choose between a system that it needs 200 spins to profit 10 u and another which needs 10  spins to profit 200u which one of them u 'll choose? Using the same br at both systems ?
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

MickyP

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #26 on: January 25, 2019, 05:34:02 PM »
Hahaha.... now you know that you have just presented a stupid point of discussion because both or neither methods could make use of triggers or are you implying that the Micky Mouse method is the one that depends on triggers?
 

MickyP

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #27 on: January 25, 2019, 05:46:05 PM »
The biggest drawdown I had till now was 50u thus 1/3 of my  lifetime br I also have to point out that in that session i had a loss of 14u , and at the previous session I had win 203u !btw the average fluctuate of 150 - 200 u  and also I 'll not stay for long time , most of the time I need a couple of hours of play at a irballs , the most quick hit was 203 u in 11 spins!

So you have the magic triggerless system. Don't know if your bet is static or not and don't really care too much either. Maybe it's just beginners luck so congratulations.
BTW, Let me know when you have worked out how to consistently make a profit on airball...lol.
 
The following users thanked this post: leowls

petespin

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #28 on: January 25, 2019, 06:09:08 PM »
I 've also win amounts like 100u at 10 spins , and micky p believe me iam not beginner to have such their ...luck , I can let u know about my every day results but I wonder what's the use? ,I really don't care what others say , I have one of the best ever systems in my hands and that's enough for me ! Let me repeat here something I 've said in the past , I don't think there are Many  members at forums that have done what I did beating casino games for over 20 years now.
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

MickyP

Re: New idea (not mine)
« Reply #29 on: January 25, 2019, 06:20:54 PM »
And twenty years later you still seek the Holy Grail. This tells me that you want consistency in your game and unfortunately from your posts I don't think you consistently show a profit.

If you have this magic system then no need to keep searching. Done!