Royal Panda roulette

Author Topic: Reading at RF  (Read 877 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Third

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #15 on: January 17, 2019, 12:58:00 AM »
I get plenty of causation out of cumulative probability; no need to go physical.
 

mr j

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #16 on: January 17, 2019, 01:10:39 AM »
I think you will have a lot of good advice to share. I look forward to reading your thread. Please break from the serious stuff now and then to share some of your crazy stories with us.

lol, I'm not too interesting. A winner? Yes. A fun guy? Welllllll
 

Joe

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #17 on: January 17, 2019, 10:28:20 AM »
Of course Steve has a good reason for doing it but I think the General just enjoys being a troll.
I've changed my mind about this, I think the General has his own agenda too. And no, I'm no longer going to post at that forum. Did you see Steve's latest advertising post? I now believe the guy is a crook and a fraudster, god knows how many people have been duped.
newbielink:https://www.scamguard.com/roulettephysicscom/ [nonactive]
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

petespin

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #18 on: January 17, 2019, 10:58:41 AM »
Guys recently I 've shared with few guys that they ask it a system where I 've found in cc forum and  combine with a progression , generated a winning method ,but there are many guys post systems without making enough testing, they claim this system "could" work!
 

MickyP

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #19 on: January 17, 2019, 12:52:44 PM »
Maybe they are not interested in the system for different reasons; could be too many numbers or whatever. Don't always presume the worst.

If someone says "could work" then it is just caution. Would you prefer they say "will work" and leave many players disappointed when it fails?
 

mr j

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2019, 02:07:09 PM »
"I now believe the guy is a crook and a fraudster" >> NOW ??  :o
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

UnlikelySam

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #21 on: January 17, 2019, 02:27:57 PM »
Guys recently I 've shared with few guys that they ask it a system where I 've found in cc forum and  combine with a progression , generated a winning method ,but there are many guys post systems without making enough testing, they claim this system "could" work!

Thing is they believe they have a working system and never say it the HG some may say it almost HG. Almost is a very far fetched term not a precise scientific one 😀  Some will methods work for years and then the inevitable Doomsday is upon those that never thought that that light of Day would ever be seen. Guess that's why method testing is solely going to have to be thoroughly to be tested by each invidual that stands to lose the most and modified and fine tuned to suit the game of plan. The originator of the idea cannot be blamed if the method bombs out as afterall it's purely that an Idea thst requires rigorous testing and then some more by the end user Lol especially if it's for free😉
 

mr j

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #22 on: January 17, 2019, 02:38:54 PM »
There are a s**t load of threads there with HG in the title.
 

UnlikelySam

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #23 on: January 17, 2019, 02:52:17 PM »
There are a s**t load of threads there with HG in the title.

In forums that's the ultimate form of free advertising to lure members to their thread a form of a snare. Imagine if this site was where you get paid for the number of views your threads accumulates like YouTube subscriptions🤔 Dam can see how many Sheeeet load of topics will be include "HG" in their title 🙄
 

petespin

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #24 on: January 17, 2019, 03:02:43 PM »
Btw there was guys at forums that really help the roulette public with their ideas ,one of them was a Croatian dealer flatino, and a guy from Australia call lanky ,  this was the early days of roulette forums , anyone who knew these guys personally?
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

UnlikelySam

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #25 on: January 17, 2019, 03:08:17 PM »
Not personally. Know of their methods especially Flatinos LETWin method.
 

UnlikelySam

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #26 on: January 17, 2019, 03:15:29 PM »
Anyways what is the verdict on betvoyager no zero roulette? I know most don't approve of online RNG and I don't blame them especially after certain damning proof was released. However BV has a fair play randomness control via Sha-256 algorithm checksum. How viable is it tho really?
 

petespin

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #27 on: January 17, 2019, 03:21:39 PM »
Unfortunately Ian not allowed to play at this casino BV , no zero roulette is a challenge even RNG !
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

UnlikelySam

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #28 on: January 17, 2019, 03:34:10 PM »
I know Petespin once you are in the profit RNG will hunt you down like dogs. Question to anyone is have they tested the fair play randomness control via Sha-256 algorithm ? Earlier on there was mention of Profit Protection Software on another thread and I agree with his post as some are implementing that kinda Sheeeet.. There is a false sense of belief that you are winning and then it all Happens...

Many Thanks in advance...

Regards

Sam.

« Last Edit: January 17, 2019, 03:37:03 PM by UnlikelySam »
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

MrPerfect.

Re: Reading at RF
« Reply #29 on: January 17, 2019, 05:14:37 PM »
Real being put at the same basket with Steve is a very offensive for Real. While Real never told any bs, Steve is full of it. ...
   Just think about " you need only little  accuracy to overcome HE" !!!!
   General rull: do never trust Australians,  all of them are children of scambags. That's how their entire country was populated . All human garbage was sent there. Nothing changed from this time... they didn't got any better.