Author Topic: Scep' s roulette strategies .  (Read 143299 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

MickyP

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #675 on: February 06, 2019, 11:26:38 PM »
    1 1 1  2 2 2 3 3 3                 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3            1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3
    1 2 3 1  2 3 1 2 3                 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3            1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
    2 3 1 3 1 2 1  2  3                3 1 2 1 2 3 2 3 1            1 2 3 2 3 1 3 1 2
    2 3 1 1 2 3 3 1  2                 2 3 1 1 2 3 3 1 2            2 3 1 1 2 3 3 1 2
                 4                                          5                                          6
    1 1 1 2 2 2  3 3 3                1 1 1 2 2 2  3 3 3            1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3
    1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3                 1 2 3 1 2 3  1 2 3            1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
    2 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 3                 3 1 2 1 2 3 2 3 1             1 2 3 2 3 1 3 1 2
    1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1                 1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1             1 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 1
               7                                               8                                      9
    1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3                1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3             1 1 1 2 2  2 3 3 3     
    1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3               1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2  3             1 2 3 1 2  3 1 2 3
    2 3 1 3 1 2 1 2 3                3 1 2 1 2 3 2 3 1             1 2 3 2 3  1 3 1 2
    3 1 2 2  3 1 1 2 3               3 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 3             3 1 2 2 3 1 1 2 3
 «Any 4 numbers in the first dozen are treated as 1-1-1-1 ( First Dozen
)Block 1- Line 3 has 3 correctBlock 2- Line 4 has 3 correctBlock 3- Line 1 has 3 correctBlock 4- Line 1 has 3 correctBlock 5- Line 1-has 3 correctBlock 6- Line 1 has 3 correctBlock 7- Line 7 has 3 correctBlock-8 Line  2 has 3 correct Block 9-Line  1 has 3 correct   
Do you now admit that you were wrong Micky P.?


Lol this proves that I am right. You are running out of steam Scepticus. Better get your words in order including an apology note to forum users for misleading them. Remember, once you commit your thoughts to word they remain a part of you and your written word is subject to lab tests....by the masses.
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #676 on: February 07, 2019, 01:22:18 PM »
Lol this proves that I am right. You are running out of steam Scepticus. Better get your words in order including an apology note to forum users for misleading them. Remember, once you commit your thoughts to word they remain a part of you and your written word is subject to lab tests....by the masses.Micky P
You asked for 4 numbers in the first dozen. As dozens they are 1-1-1-1-
I have done what you asked .Showed that each of the 9 blocks has 3 correct in one of it's columns ,

So just why do you think you have  been proved right ?  You need to show proof of your claim so let's have it Mickyboy !

As Thomas pointed out it is you that needs to remember that when you commit yourthoughts   to words they remain a part of your written word.   You wrote that the chance of a zero occuring is NOT 1 in 37 LOL !
   
 

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #677 on: February 07, 2019, 04:16:08 PM »
 «Any 4 numbers in the first dozen are treated as 1-1-1-1 ( First Dozen
)Block 1- Line 3 has 3 correctBlock 2- Line 4 has 3 correctBlock 3- Line 1 has 3 correctBlock 4- Line 1 has 3 correctBlock 5- Line 1-has 3 correcBlock 6- Line 1 has 3 correctBlock 7- Line 7 has 3 correctBlock-8 Line  2 has 3 correctBlock 9-Line  1 has 3 correct   Clearer ?Tried to separate the lines but  the  site's software squeezes them up .
« Last Edit: February 07, 2019, 04:19:16 PM by scepticus »
 

MickyP

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #678 on: February 07, 2019, 04:50:23 PM »
I suggest you go back and read my posts where I outlined why your 9 block tool is worthless and your guarantee is fake.

You take half a sentence and pull it completely out of context but hey, have fun.

 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #679 on: February 07, 2019, 06:11:36 PM »

You have not disproved that there is a guarantee of 3 in 4 .
From that we can deduce  that - after the first 2 spins - ONE of the 4 remaining  options MUST be correct .
One  is a  one - chip - bet while the other 3  are 2 chip bets . ASSUMING THAT EACH SPIN GIVES A RANDOM WINNING NUMBER then any of the 4 options have an expectation of winning 9 times in an average 36 spns. They can expect to collect 9 x 9= 81for an expenditure of 37 x 2 =74 for a profit of 9 chips over those average 37 spins.

In addition, I have evidence of it being  validated .. What have you got Mickyboy ? Very little.  You still don't understand that it is a 2 stage method. You did , finally, understand that the first two spins need to be Virtual Bets so try a bit harder and you will, finally, Get It  !

I have clearly got under your skin because i have shown that you are a liar and have insufficient knowledge  to be the Roulette  Professional . This is why  you  refuse to admit that you are wrong.
 
« Last Edit: February 11, 2019, 12:05:28 AM by kav »
 

MickyP

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #680 on: February 07, 2019, 07:18:44 PM »
"You have not disproved that there is a guarantee of 3 in 4 .From that we can deduce  that - after the first 2 spins - ONE of the 4 remaining  options MUST be correct"
Each betting opportunity (mini game) covers 4 spins. The first two spins are dead as no bets are placed. These two dead spins (virtual if you like) form part of your guarantee, Why? You now have two remaining spins to actually place chips on but somehow you say you still have 4 spins to play with actual bets. I was okay with the math part until now.
You keep changing the words and all you are doing is sowing confusion.
Also, is it necessary to lace your replies to me with insults?
Your guarantee will pan out in one of the 9 blocks so in one of the 9 blocks you will get that positive result. I stated this in my one of earlier posts and i said I don't dispute the math. You say any block can be used and I disagree. The example I gave you with 4 numbers in dozen one, 1 1 1 1, will only win in block 6. There are still two other alternatives that will result in a loss, 1 1 1 2 and 1 1 1 3. They are in block 3 and block 9.

It remains a coin flip system.
« Last Edit: February 07, 2019, 07:28:14 PM by MickyP »
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #681 on: February 07, 2019, 08:00:18 PM »
Your logic is faulty Micky.
Where did Isay that there were 4 remaining spins AFTER the first two ?
The guarantee WILL PAN OUT  in ALL 9 blocks I actually showed that so why do yiu dispute it ?
You made the same mistake as Mike did - and you have learrned nothing frorm it.  You are thinking about  FOURSOMES and the blocks deal with THREESOMES. So you still haven't got it . 

It is you that  has flipped Micky . Not the coin .
As for me insulting you what about your insuls
No deal because you will change the words to suit the outcome. "Liberals at their best"... LOL.
or
Shake it off and start again. DRAW PICTURES IF YOU HAVE TO. 
« Last Edit: February 07, 2019, 08:02:59 PM by scepticus »
 

MickyP

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #682 on: February 07, 2019, 08:18:56 PM »
4 remaining options is not 4 remaining spins. I stand corrected on that point but that changes nothing as I continued with the 4 spin mini game of which 2 spins are eliminated as no actual bets are placed. They are simply used as a trigger to identify your first bet which is on spin 3.
You can only win with chips on the table and you only bet on two spins. So how can you proclaim to Guarantee 3 wins from 4? Not enough spins to fulfill this promise.
Besides the fake guarantee it still remains a guessing game and guessing is a coin flip.
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #683 on: February 07, 2019, 08:48:34 PM »
For the benefit of  recently joined members the  Nine  Blocks  and Five -in 7 EC charts were produced by a Professional Mathematician - employed by the Football Pools -for use in Football Pools in the UK  away back in the late 1940s - early 1950s . 

As anyone can see they refer to Sets of Three in one case  and Sets of Two  (-think H / T ) -in the other. 

As  maths is transferable I thought they may be useful in betting roulette. The Home - Away -Draw being replaced by the 1-2-3- of the dozens and Columns .
Later ,  to give myself more options , I introduced the Dice idea . Same maths as roulette when the 6 spots of the Die are  replaced by the 6 Double Streets. The   difference, of course,  being the zero in roulette  but all roulette systems /methods need to overcome the unfavourable odds.

In introducing them I had hoped that the Math Geeks of the forum would examine them and find a more profitable method than I had  worked out . How wrong I was !
 

MickyP

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #684 on: February 08, 2019, 02:00:23 AM »
Hahaha......you ran out of steam.

To all the new members interested in this topic, please post your questions/comments by using the reply button.

"As  maths is transferable I thought they may be useful in betting roulette." Scepticus.

 ;D

 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #685 on: February 08, 2019, 09:25:18 PM »
My approach to roulette is a bit different to most others in the forum  ;D
I see maths as dealing with numbers .   I see  roulette as dealing with numbers .  So why should
using a maths base appoach  not be a viable one. 

THe winning number . -

MUST be in a dozen - Must be in a column - MUST be High 0r LOw - Must be Odd or Even  - Must be Red or Black etc.. so might not  juggling with the probabilities of these be a possible solution to a " Long Standing Problem " ?

If the 9 block idea produces a Guarantee then , logically,  prior numbers DO have an effect on following numbers .

My inclination is to REDUCE the Table Bankroll as far as possible to avoid the bankruptcy so often experienced by progressions. This is easier to achieve using maths  than by progressions.
« Last Edit: February 08, 2019, 09:28:18 PM by scepticus »
 
The following users thanked this post: juice

kav

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #686 on: February 11, 2019, 12:06:22 AM »
Please keep it civil, I don't want to lock the topic.
 
The following users thanked this post: scepticus, GIAJJENNO

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #687 on: February 12, 2019, 03:16:45 PM »
The significance of the  Nine Blocks is that they show  that prior spins do have an effect on future spins.
If, after the first spin ,  the initial 32 possibilities are reduced to 18 then why doesn't this have an effecton future probabilities  ? 
 

MickyP

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #688 on: February 12, 2019, 03:38:28 PM »
You make a bold and incorrect statement then you pose a question asking others to justify your statement. HUH!

Go back through your thread and other threads on the subject of spin independence; read what Mike and Real tried to explain to you. Maybe if you put aside the attitude and try and understand then you will be able to move forward with your game.
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

scepticus

Re: Scep' s roulette strategies .
« Reply #689 on: February 12, 2019, 05:13:31 PM »

You make a bold and incorrect statement then you pose a question asking others to justify your statement. HUH!

Go back through your thread and other threads on the subject of spin independence; read what Mike and Real tried to explain to you. Maybe if you put aside the attitude and try and understand then you will be able to move forward with your game.

S - I_I__G - H  !