Author Topic: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens  (Read 6299 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

scepticus

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2018, 04:20:18 AM »
Not only did I  SAY that you had a Cold number method - I POSTED it 1
Ohers ridiculed it  ! You said it was and old post and objected to my postig it - and now you say I am backing off !
You have a convenient memory , Ken . Remember what suits you and forget what doesn't .  .

 

mr j

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2018, 04:29:53 AM »
I asked for the date on that??
 

mr j

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2018, 04:31:18 AM »
I also posted a method for using a Marty on the EC's (maybe 15 years ago). Will you search for and post that as well?
 

mr j

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2018, 04:36:19 AM »
Not only did I  SAY that you had a Cold number method 


I have to look at the WORDING on this. HAD or HAVE? If its very OLD (had) does that imply I use it today or even still endorse it today? I would be embarrassed if my method THOUGHTS were the SAME from YEARS past, damn embarrassing (lol). That would mean I have not GROWN or advanced. Embarrassing!
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

scepticus

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2018, 04:38:52 AM »
If I remeber correctly You said it was an old post from 6 or 8 years ago.
You also told Real- whatevr - in anher forum that I claimed to have multie HGs .

That was a lie ken . Shame on you  !
My question relates to - what you do NOW .Not what you did years ago . If you changed then you might change s again soon , mightn't you ?

 

mr j

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2018, 04:41:07 AM »
Another point as long as I am on a roll. I read a funny definition years ago on the boards. The people that really dislike you or want to CAUSE s**t, will go searching for it. Meaning, how did you come up with that cold number method? (lol) What the enemy does, they search for older material in order to cause chaos. Its actually a form of flattery imo. Throwing fuel on a fire.

"If you changed then you might change s again soon , mightn't you?" >> I pray to God nightly that I do. It means I'm not STUCK in neutral. Advance in this game or take up BINGO. You stated you POSTED the cold number method. Do you know that DATE, how did you find it?

Not only did I  SAY that you had a Cold number method - I POSTED it

>>> I POSTED it <<<

You also told Real- whatevr - in anher forum that I claimed to have multie HGs .
 

I would say multiple here (and RF) have claimed over multiple years, they have a HG. I have never used the TERM nor will I.

A HG does not exist, period.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2018, 08:41:31 AM by kav »
 

scepticus

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #21 on: December 30, 2018, 03:31:58 PM »
As usual ken, you avoid the point at issue.
You said that I had claimed Multiple HGs.  I did not  so you deliberately told an untruth  but don't want to admit it . I have said that there can be no HG but there can be a winningsystem . One that wins in the Here and Now , not in some Airy Fairy Future . So admit your untruth and we are done here .

I am not concerned with what you used to do . All I am asking you to do is tell us what core idea you use .  If you have nothing worthwhile then you cannot claim to be  an " experienced gambler ". Multipe Visits to a casino does not allow you to claim " experience " unless you have found something worthwhile .And you haven't or you wouldn't still be searching
All professional gamblers - in any gambling environment - have a core  idea which they  juggle around with . You have none .
« Last Edit: December 30, 2018, 03:33:33 PM by scepticus »
 

MickyP

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #22 on: December 30, 2018, 04:14:00 PM »
I think you are wrong here Scepticus. Ken has a method, actually three "methods" that he plays with. The fact that he is not willing to share is his prerogative. Your post is another way of begging him to reveal his methods. If you want it so badly then start looking at playing a few numbers and maybe you will come up with something worthwhile.
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j, Third

mr j

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #23 on: December 30, 2018, 04:27:06 PM »
"Multiple Visits to a casino does not allow you to claim " experience " unless you have found something worthwhile" >> 100% not correct. So "experience" only means GOOD at something? (lol) If a basketball team plays 100 games per year for 5 years and after that only has a record of, 60-440.

That team does not have experience?
 
 

scepticus

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #24 on: December 30, 2018, 04:42:43 PM »
Yes ken.To win at roulette you need to be " good " , not just know the rules.
I don't know why you contiue to think that I am asking you to share your " system /s " . I have made it clear that I am asking for your core idea.  Is it about Cold numbers / Hot numbers / Streaks / repeaters  or what ? No detail necessary.

You continue to be in denial about your claim that I claimed that I had " multiple HGs ". Why ?
 

mr j

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2018, 04:59:32 PM »
"Yes ken.To win at roulette you need to be " good " , not just know the rules" >> I did not ask that. I asked in terms of YOUR definition of experience. IS THIS EXPERIENCE? >> If a basketball team plays 100 games per year for 5 years and after that only has a record of, 60-440.  Even though this record sucks, does this team have experience?
 

scepticus

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2018, 05:05:41 PM »
By not  admitting that you made a mistake by saying that I claimed " multiple HGs" ken, you make yoursef a self-proclaimed liar .
Your ducking and diving  doesn't hide the fact .
 

scepticus

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2018, 05:10:17 PM »
I think you are wrong here Scepticus. Ken has a method, actually three "methods" that he plays with. The fact that he is not willing to share is his prerogative. Your post is another way of begging him to reveal his methods. If you want it so badly then start looking at playing a few numbers and maybe you will come up with something worthwhile.
 

scepticus

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2018, 05:10:38 PM »
Scepticus had published his favorite 9 Block theory, I understand the approach from here: https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php?topic=263.msg4377#msg4377. He put it with detailed explanation here: https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php?topic=263.0 
  I am fan of methods on dozens, although I never played the dozen method that Scepticus described here on B&M table, I wanted to write code to test it for two reasons- one, to check how it performs and two, author is strong believer of these methods.
 
  I tested two input files(with initial BR of 1000 units), results are not that bad:
 
  first file produced:
                             NEW HIGH BALANCE OVERALL: 1293
                             ALL TIME LOW BALANCE: 991   
  second file produced:
                            NEW HIGH BALANCE OVERALL: 1057
                            ALL TIME LOW BALANCE: 859
                 
   fileplay is attached for your reference with sample input files.
   
   @Scepticus: please let me know if I have understood your approach as you wrote. I can correct the code if you think I did not get it!! or if the output files have bugs.
                             

 

mr j

Re: Results for Scepticus 9 Block theory for Dozens
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2018, 05:19:15 PM »
"Yes ken.To win at roulette you need to be " good " , not just know the rules" >> I did not ask that. I asked in terms of YOUR definition of experience. IS THIS EXPERIENCE? >> If a basketball team plays 100 games per year for 5 years and after that only has a record of, 60-440.  Even though this record sucks, does this team have experience?

I knew you wouldn't answer. HaHaHaHaHa

Experience is only if you are good at something (WTF?) HaHaHaHa