Royal Panda roulette

Author Topic: Big frustration. Some working systems but not applicable without automation.  (Read 1918 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mr j

Please stop trolling me. I reported this to Kav.
 

mr j

"simply state your views as an opinion" >> This is the huge issue. What if something I say is NOT an opinion (but factual) but you say it isn't?   Do I leave it at that? Should I leave it at that? Keep in mind, I dont care about your answer but I am curious. Also, please tone down the attacks on other members, it would be refreshing.  8)
If I say bet on the 2 4 6 8 after an odd number hits, you'll have an 87% chance of hitting. According to you, that stat/post should not be questioned, just let it go. Thats the biggest issue on these boards. Think about this gem, past & present.....which 3 guys do you most likely NOT like? Probably Mike, Real & myself.
Are you noticing a pattern? Why those three? (lol)
 

Third

The three you mention consistently lie about roulette and attack those that disagree with them and try to prevent people from being successful in playing roulette.  There are two kinds of people in this world:  People that criticize and people that help.  If you want to help you will tone it down otherwise we don't care about your whining.
 

Third

Why can't you just drop the act and be the kewl Mr. J that everyone likes?  Quit the trolling.  I mean seriously, before you started this trolling thing, I actually liked you and had alot of respect for you.  I mean what happened to you, did you take a serious fall and hit your head or something?
« Last Edit: December 24, 2018, 05:44:32 AM by Third »
 

Third

Look, I am not making this stuff up.  Here is a concrete example:

https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php?topic=2597.msg41355#msg41355

Now, notice the approach I take:

Great post!  Do you do anything special on your next visit if you exhaust your bankroll on the last visit?

This is a great post because of the great effort that the poster put into designing his system and explaining it.  The next thing I did was question him about how evolved his system is because I noticed that he didn't have anything about recovery (this is a requirement if a person wishes to win in roulette).  Was I critical of him because he didn't disclose any recovery information?  NO.  Instead I queried him in an attempt to HELP.

Now, here is your approach:

"We will be covering 17 out of 37 numbers" >> Too many numbers, it won't win.Ken

Dismissive.  Arrogant.  Lying.  I personally know people that play over 18 numbers and are consistently winning players.  YOU ARE STATING YOUR OPINION AS IF IT IS FACT.  PROTIP: IT ISN'T!

Let me show you a better, more helpful approach:

Quote from: Helpful Mr. J
You know I personally gave up betting more than 4-5 numbers because the bankroll requirements were so high and it was so difficult to recover.  What kind of recovery plan do you have?

See the difference?  See the sincerity in actually wishing to help people instead of wishing to act like the Creator and Authority of Roulette From Which Nobody Can Deviate and Yet Live?  Because that is exactly how silly you sound.  One member here privately disclosed to me that he specifically finds your posting "unpleasant".

Being profitable doesn't release you from the responsibility of common decency, politeness and respect for fellow members, regardless of how you perceive their level of competence.

Why should anyone believe that you actually want to help anyone? 

Why shouldn't any of us believe that all you are here doing is exalting your own ego and only wish to aggrandize yourself?

We are sick and tired of hearing how much greater you are than the rest of us.  If you are so much greater, go start your own forum instead of trying to wreck this one. 
« Last Edit: December 24, 2018, 07:31:56 AM by Third »
 

MrPerfect.

Third , on my humble oppinion he is not a player. He is here for fun.
   There are only so much things that can be done in roulette. People know these things or they do not. If they do or not can be seen easy just by the way they tolk. Besides,  winning players are a bit more humble .   
 
The following users thanked this post: MickyP

dobbelsteen

I am not a follower of the  explanation of the roulette theory from Mr J and Pallestis. This discussion is mostly  a waist time. I am not interested in the mathematical results of long run sessions. I have developed the long and short run theory. My opponents (criticasters)mostly do not know the difference between long and short run sessions. In general every player  play short run events. This is why I research particular small samples up to 250 spins. Mr J and Pallestis write always about systems. The features of systems are well known. Without  a strategy any system will fail. They never speak about strategies. I agree the explanation of Third
 

mr j

"If I say bet on the 2 4 6 8 after an odd number hits, you'll have an 87% chance of hitting. According to you guys, that stat/post should not be questioned? >> Nobody answered me yet, big surprise. If a member (any member) had posted this, MOST of you would be ALL OVER that guy. Admit it. Why is that ok? If you are clearly wrong about something, why am I (or Mike & Real) the bad guys for TELLING you you're wrong? You can/will do it but God forbid its done to you.
 

mr j

"Why can't you just drop the act and be the kewl Mr. J that everyone likes?" >> If that means lying to myself (and you), then I cant do it. Its funny, instead of getting "thank yous", I get trolled on AND attacked. I said it before, use your EXACT rules for your system at a B&M under EXACT casino conditions, Do this for five years, lets see how you do. If you cant make a living from your system, then its__________.
 

kav

  • https://www.youtube.com/c/rouletteman
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2336
  • Thanked: 1317 times
  • Gender: Male
Please everyone focus on the subject not the person.
Thanks
 

scepticus

"We will be covering 17 out of 37 numbers" .Too many numbers, it won't win.Ken
Maximum numbers to bet is  17  .. Ed . Thorp
 

mr j

"We will be covering 17 out of 37 numbers" .Too many numbers, it won't win.Ken
Maximum numbers to bet is  17  .. Ed . Thorp


What did Kav just post before your post? WOW !!!!
 

scepticus

                  Topic: Big frustration. Some working systems but not applicable without automation.
Some Working  Systems are  simple and some complex  . Most Bettors favour one or the other . Some use few numbers and some use many numbers  so it depends on the Method employed s o long as the method employed is a calculated one  and  uses  no more than 17 numbers .  17 is  the  largest number to give  a Better - Than Evens return  .