New Forum Address: ROULETTELIFE.COM
  Update your Bookmarks

Author Topic: Percentage's Even Chance System  (Read 1556 times)

palestis, scepticus, leowls and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

medardo

Percentage's Even Chance System
« on: December 05, 2018, 12:51:03 PM »
Hello!

English is not my native language so you know. :-)

I am new in this forum and I wish to share which system I am
playing and to see what other people think about that.

HERE IS THE SYSTEM IN SIMPLE STEPS:

1. Play Evolution Gaming live casino
2. Enter table, open stats and put to 50 numbers stats
3. Look for any Even chances big diffrences like Black 70% and Red 30%
4. Wait for run of Black to end and when Red hit first time play 1 unit
5. If you loose stop and wait Red to hit again and play again flat bet 1 unit
6. Play like that till you are 1 unit in profit
7. Good luck

If you chcek Percentage's  for 500 numbers you will se 50-50 for all
even chances, of course zero will be 2% so you will see 50-48 or 46-52.

So, you just must be patient and wait 70-30 or 65-35 for any even chances, it can
be Black/Red, Odd/Even or High/Low.

I have also stop/losse of 10 units, if that happen I play on next table 5 units
bet because I never losse 2 tables in a row. You can make your own money
managment.

You can play in any live casino with stats option, I like Evolution Gaming
because you can monitor 15+ tables all the time.

Any person how like to say something please try first and then say so
we can have good discussion.

Medardo
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 01:06:20 PM by medardo »
 
The following users thanked this post: Sputnik, scepticus, funtomas76, Third

palestis

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2018, 03:11:40 PM »
What you describe represents a golden opportunity. But don't expect to see such situation often.
It's great if you use it as a back up system, but as a main system might cause you to leave the casino without any action.
The same can be said for columns and dozens ( if they are 50, 40 and 10% in frequency).
Also for DS's and streets.
But as the group grows smaller, the count of numbers they were observed form, must come from a much bigger count of numbers.
And the good thing about this situation, is that  you only have to bet flat and usually with higher than normal chip values.   
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

medardo

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2018, 03:41:53 PM »

Thanks for replay.

I play for years in land based casino and as you say I sometimes wait all night so
I can see 65-35 %.

But now I have open 30+ tables in several online live dealer tables and you dont
need to wait so long but again you need to wait for 1 hour to start betting.

I play when I have time and when I wait for 6 hours and did not losse nothing it is
winning session for me.
 
The following users thanked this post: scepticus, Third

Sputnik

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2018, 03:59:27 PM »


 I like this idea very much and make me think of - Reversals - that means you break even after a drawdown.
 There is a book where the creator simulate 60.000 placed bets using different staking plans.

 One of them was flatbetting and you got over 86% reversals flatbetting 100 placed bets samples.
 Average two every 100 placed bets.

 This means i fully understand why your method works.

 What i don't know or understand is the strength behind the imbalance.
 You say 70 versus 30.

 Have you been testing 80 versus 20 or any other amounts.

Cheers
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

medardo

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2018, 04:15:34 PM »
Thanks for replay.

The problem with 90-10 % or 80-20 % or 100-0 % :-)
is TIME.

You dont have time to see that and I calculate that 65-35 % or 70-30 %
is optimal for waiting if you have open at least 10+ tables with live dealers,
on Evolution Gaming platform you have 15 tables, I play there. All big casinos
have Evolution Gaming platform available.

The best is that you test it for yourself, you can start with very small bankroll,
thats is also great with this system, you just need to be patient.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 04:18:51 PM by medardo »
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

Third

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2018, 04:21:30 PM »
I like the power of so many online wheels to monitor.
 

gizmotron

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2018, 05:50:40 PM »
You guys don't need to wait that long. You just need more of your favorite sized groupings. In this example all sets are sized for EC betting.
[/size]

[/size] W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  01  --  10 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  02  --  24 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  03  --  21 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  04  --  18 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size]   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  05  --  37 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  06  --  09 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  07  --  01 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  08  --  21 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size]   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  09  --  38 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  10  --  32 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  11  --  18 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  12  --  24 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  13  --  31 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size]   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  14  --  38 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  15  --  32 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  16  --  16 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  17  --  29 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  18  --  02 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  19  --  34 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  20  --  24 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  21  --  18 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  22  --  09 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  23  --  31 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  24  --  28 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  25  --  24 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  26  --  17 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  27  --  36 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  28  --  26 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  29  --  05 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  30  --  24 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  31  --  06 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  32  --  10 ( $ -360 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  33  --  30 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  34  --  26 ( $ -360 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  35  --  17 ( $ -450 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  36  --  16 ( $ -360 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  37  --  16 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  38  --  28 ( $ -360 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  39  --  03 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  40  --  14 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  41  --  11 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  42  --  18 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  43  --  14 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  44  --  30 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  45  --  04 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  46  --  02 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  47  --  26 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  48  --  35 ( $ -360 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  49  --  18 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  50  --  07 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  51  --  20 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  52  --  10 ( $ -360 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  53  --  23 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  54  --  01 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  55  --  12 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  56  --  30 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  57  --  08 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  58  --  10 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  59  --  23 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  60  --  23 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  61  --  12 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  62  --  01 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  63  --  10 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  64  --  22 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  65  --  02 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size]   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  66  --  38 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  67  --  22 ( $ -270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  68  --  23 ( $ -180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  69  --  05 ( $ -90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  70  --  27 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  71  --  07 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  72  --  02 ( $ 0 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  73  --  27 ( $ 90 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  74  --  19 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  75  --  18 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  76  --  31 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  77  --  36 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  78  --  18 ( $ 360 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  79  --  03 ( $ 450 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  80  --  16 ( $ 540 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  81  --  07 ( $ 630 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  82  --  29 ( $ 540 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  83  --  06 ( $ 450 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  84  --  11 ( $ 360 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  85  --  28 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  86  --  16 ( $ 360 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  87  --  11 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  88  --  21 ( $ 360 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  89  --  29 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  90  --  03 ( $ 360 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  91  --  06 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  92  --  29 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  93  --  21 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size]   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  94  --  26 ( $ 180 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  95  --  07 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  96  --  36 ( $ 360 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  97  --  17 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  98  --  07 ( $ 360 ) Red
[/size]   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  99  --  17 ( $ 270 ) Red
[/size] X |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  100  --  07 ( $ 360 ) Red[/size]
 
You will notice that the "Even" set of numbers has an incredible domination with almost all singles occurring in the "Odd" set as its opposites. So you can go right back to hammering the "Evens" after each lost bet. These shorter, more powerful domination stretches, are what make up a 65% - 35% ratio for an overall condition. It's better to hunt the big swings than the hoped for percentage prediction of an expected reversal.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2018, 05:52:28 PM by gizmotron »
 

scepticus

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2018, 05:56:54 PM »
Gizmo
Have you tried "  Trends " ?
Say, After two consecutive the same bet that "Trend " to  continue - Stop at a loss .
After a loss wait for another two conseutive the same before betting . Don't "chase " losses .
 
The following users thanked this post: SugTips

gizmotron

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2018, 06:35:52 PM »
Gizmo
Have you tried "  Trends " ?
Say, After two consecutive the same bet that "Trend " to  continue - Stop at a loss .
After a loss wait for another two conseutive the same before betting . Don't "chase " losses .

Are you kidding me? I invented them. I published the characteristics of reading randomness a very long time ago. They include trends, patterns, dominance, series and a bigger picture trend, the "Global Effect." And to add to that the very very rare "Elegant Pattern" where a strong trend executes perfectly and for as many as 30 spins in a row.

I use doubles as a trigger if there are dominance of triples or larger in mass flow. Also, don't chase losses. In fact, use a virtual bet after each lost bet unless singles are in dominance.
 

Mike

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2018, 07:16:47 PM »
There are two opposing points of view expressed in this thread : the trend will continue or it will reverse. As a strategy they can't BOTH be correct!

Of course there is a third possibility : that neither is more likely to happen than the other.  ;)
Whichever camp you belong to, can you give any statistical evidence to support your view? I can.

 
 

scepticus

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #10 on: December 05, 2018, 08:00:55 PM »
They CAN both be correct ,Mike.
In the Financial Markets Some Professioinals bet WITH THE TREND while some others bet BREAKOUTS and they both make profits from their betting . They bet at different times . So why can't roulette players ?
Statistical Evidence would mean using Past Spins so how can you do that and also argue  that past spins are irrelevant ?

 

gizmotron

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #11 on: December 05, 2018, 08:17:29 PM »
There are two opposing points of view expressed in this thread : the trend will continue or it will reverse. As a strategy they can't BOTH be correct!

Of course there is a third possibility : that neither is more likely to happen than the other.  ;)
Whichever camp you belong to, can you give any statistical evidence to support your view? I can.

Boy are you a classic mathBoyz. There are two ways to really look at this. You bet with what is already continuing and as long as it continues to pay off or you do the other idea and hope that it changes to dominating the opposite side, which is classic gamblers's fallacy. A dominance is not really expected to follow in an opposite dominance, even if it is to win a single net one win. And dominance of any side of groupings are likely to occur on their own where expecting something at an exact point or any point is not necessary anyway. When it happens it happens and when it stops it stops. There are no triggers in guessing.

These are not apposing points of view as you suggest that they are. The trend will continue or the trend dominance will not continue and would be an opposing point of view. The trend will continue or the world will respond to your hopes with wishful thinking and is not the opposite. But your mind is cluttered with the ability to see this your way. You are not thinking it thru. They are not opposing ideas.

As far as a third way, I agree with you. Nothing can tell you when a constancy starts, how long it will last, and how or when it will end.

Statistics can't be used as a trigger. But I recommend that you try that for a few years as you are such an expert at gambling. Thanks for today's lesson in wannabee logic.
 

Mike

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #12 on: December 05, 2018, 11:07:02 PM »
They CAN both be correct ,Mike.
In the Financial Markets Some Professioinals bet WITH THE TREND while some others bet BREAKOUTS and they both make profits from their betting . They bet at different times . So why can't roulette players ?
That's not what's being suggested here. One person is saying that you should bet for a reversal and the other says bet for continuance, on the SAME event.

Quote
Statistical Evidence would mean using Past Spins so how can you do that and also argue  that past spins are irrelevant ?
As usual, you're misrepresenting what I've actually said. I never said past spins are irrelevant - how else could you determine a distribution? What's irrelevant are TRIGGERS. Triggers don't make any difference when they're based only on past numbers.
 

scepticus

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #13 on: December 05, 2018, 11:22:14 PM »
You are ducking and diving here Mike.

Irrespective of your interpretation of posts in this thread  you are still wrong to claim that they cannot  both be winning strategies.

Are you denying that in previous posts in this forum you claimed that past spins were irrelevant ?
 

gizmotron

Re: Percentage's Even Chance System
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2018, 12:25:59 AM »
That's not what's being suggested here. One person is saying that you should bet for a reversal and the other says bet for continuance, on the SAME event.

Perhaps I should clarify this a little. Mike is not completely wrong. I should have communicated that I would stop keep betting the good side until it apparently comes to an end. The other guy wants it to come to an end just so that he can start betting on the other side.

I think that that is clear now but I'm gladly open to any thinking that shows different aspects.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2018, 12:41:54 AM by gizmotron »