New Forum Address: ROULETTELIFE.COM
  Update your Bookmarks

Author Topic: Hits v Repeaters  (Read 6831 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mr j

Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #105 on: July 30, 2018, 01:24:19 AM »
Another quote (not Turbo) from a long term player >>"He must go thru this phase. It's part of gaining experience".
----------------------------------------------------
100% correct. Meaning, (PHASE PHASE PHASE) the young pups must get "this" out of their system in order to MOVE ON in later months/years.
Ken
 

sam41

Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #106 on: August 03, 2018, 08:12:44 PM »
So if we can safely ignore cold numbers why don't we all just play 32 numbers, not covering the 5 coldest? Hit and run. £3200 on the table for £400 profit. One spin a day. We never lose our bank because colds didn't wake up yet!

Or why don't we play 18 numbers, leaving out the 5 cold? We're essentially then playing 18 Vs 14 numbers which gives us a huge edge, even if the occasional cold does hit.

Something tells me it won't be as simple as this though!
« Last Edit: August 03, 2018, 08:15:36 PM by sam41 »
 
The following users thanked this post: palestis, GIAJJENNO

mr j

Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #107 on: August 03, 2018, 11:36:39 PM »
or play the 3-4 hottest but under extreme disciplined conditions/rules? There's a thought.

Ken
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1984
  • Thanked: 338 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #108 on: September 20, 2018, 01:41:20 PM »
Years ago I was betting on Smart live casino in similar way...there was a sequence which had 23 uniques in 30 spins, which way would you bet??
I bet for a repeater the remaining 7 spins and lost 7 times in a row while 7 new uniques came in 7 successive spins, making for 30 uniques in 37 spins...you can never be too sure!

We are trying to learn by experience (practical knowledge) but the game keeps reminding us that we know nothing!
You go for repeats and uniques dominate, you back the uniques and repeats happen...sit could happen in many ways, be prepared!
 

mr j

Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #109 on: September 20, 2018, 07:52:57 PM »
I'm bad at wording this but I'll try.....when a method is working out pretty good, but test after test after test, you keep hitting a brick wall at a certain point.

Up to that brick wall point, keep THAT PART of the method off to the side. I always look at a method in terms of, sections of the rules. Even the worst methods (like here) have something decent about it.

Anyways, lets say you were to bet on hot numbers (as an example). You can come up with at least 25 variations (or rules) for your method. Most people will not THINK OF 25 variations. IMO, most will come up with around 5. It leaves a ton more work to do. *MOST* have little interest in this "more work to do" style.
I pity them...no wait...I dont.

 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1984
  • Thanked: 338 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #110 on: September 20, 2018, 08:14:02 PM »
You think you're perfect, yes it's true!
This world has been made for me and you...
Things have not gone the way I planned...you gotta to tell me, I need to know!  8)

 

mr j

Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #111 on: September 20, 2018, 09:51:13 PM »
Perfect? No, but getting closer by the month.

Ken
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1984
  • Thanked: 338 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #112 on: September 20, 2018, 10:05:13 PM »
Perhaps after death you'll get there...keep walking!
 

MrPerfect.

Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #113 on: September 21, 2018, 04:15:20 PM »
Perfect can be only one  :P
 
The following users thanked this post: BlueAngel

Third

Re: Hits v Repeaters
« Reply #114 on: November 08, 2018, 01:25:02 AM »
I like this thread.  I think starting over on the repeater list is a mistake.