blockdamofo

Author Topic: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON  (Read 4500 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

GIAJJENNO

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #15 on: August 31, 2018, 11:06:34 AM »
Thanks the offer, but I obviously reject is, I dont need other sport betting setvices.
 

Sputnik

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #16 on: August 31, 2018, 12:26:26 PM »


 That's fine and I understand.
For me is a new territory trading for live price changes among other trading options.
Is different than just use "value betting" to evaluate the performance of a team to win or lose a game
.
Cheers
 

GIAJJENNO

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #17 on: August 31, 2018, 02:04:16 PM »
Write about it here a few for free :)
 

Sputnik

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #18 on: September 01, 2018, 03:43:32 PM »


Bad idea, if some one split the cost you get the candy, if not you will stay the same with no further development and no new skills as gambler.
 

MrPerfect.

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #19 on: September 01, 2018, 10:21:11 PM »
I will simply summarise what Sputnik has written in this tread:
  1. VB doesn't work and physics play is dead. It's despite the fact that according to himself  there are few that can win using same DEAD PHYSICS and devices based on it.... how to understand it , who knows?
  2. He doesn't need sports betting advice from professional anymore, he needs "return on investment" ... few bucks,  isn't it?
  3. It's better to play systems for "fun" , then get the courage and learn how to play properly, it's because of today's "wheels and conditions"  according to him.
     Is it only me or others see contradictions as well?
   
 

Sputnik

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #20 on: September 02, 2018, 06:58:45 AM »
Quote
1. VB doesn't work and physics play is dead. It's despite the fact that according to himself  there are few that can win using same DEAD PHYSICS and devices based on it.... how to understand it , who knows?

Yes i agree that VB/Bias is dead
Quote
2. He doesn't need sports betting advice from professional anymore, he needs "return on investment" ... few bucks,  isn't it?
Yes i agree that i do fine using sportbetting, but also use Sportbetting service as Hedge - I buy trading material as is different using live games with price changes like the stock market. And i take advice from proffesionals.
[font=]  [/font]
Quote
[font=]3. It's better to play systems for "fun" , then get the courage and learn how to play properly, it's because of today's "wheels and conditions"  according to him. [/font]
[font=][/font]
Yes i agree is better to play systems then use VB/Bias solutions that does not work with todays wheels.
Have a good day
Cheers
« Last Edit: September 02, 2018, 07:07:34 AM by Sputnik »
 

MrPerfect.

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #21 on: September 02, 2018, 07:46:18 AM »
Sputnik...
   How physics based solutions can not work if there are some that can win with them( according to yourself)  on today's wheels with today's conditions? Or you wanna say that the God himself cansel physics while you play? Yet the same God allow others to win using same physics,  that somehow is not working for you.
Do you live same world as others?
    Not long ego you were advocating for red/ black play, now you say it's better do for " fun".
Did the God cansel that as well? Same as he cansel sports betting,so now it needs Hedging , right?
   So l wonder, what gonna be next? Trading, forex,  speculation on criptos? Wich one will suddenly be " switched off" by the God?
 

Sputnik

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #22 on: September 02, 2018, 08:03:47 AM »


My opinion …

There is rare persons who can win that has the time and skills and been around using physics for more then 10 years. Does who play for a living i can count on one hand. And does who succés winning more then they lose i can count on my other hand. All the others can not win or become professionals because they don't know how to tackle roulette with todays conditions.

You might have other opinion and that is fine with me.

Cheers

 

MrPerfect.

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #23 on: September 02, 2018, 04:08:02 PM »
It's not about opinions. .. physics do work or it doesn't.  Last time l checked, it was a branch of math, and it very well supposed to work same way as it worked 10 years ego. Nothing changed.
   It's difficult to win more due to casinos being on alert and people have no money... players get more attention and casinos are struggling for business themselves.  It has nothing to do with physics itself.
 

Sputnik

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #24 on: September 02, 2018, 05:12:22 PM »
Nonsense, everything change and you don't have same conditions or opportunities today.
Now i am sorry to say that i have no time to debate about things that is not working for the majority.

And i don't get anything out of discuss this with some one like you, so i give you the chance to write and add the last word about it, because i think is a waste of time to discuss something that is dead and stop working.

But maybe you can find someone else to talk to.

Have a nice evening …

Cheers
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j

Bebediktus

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #25 on: September 03, 2018, 12:09:33 PM »
There is rare persons who can win that has the time and skills and been around using physics for more then 10 years. Does who play for a living i can count on one hand. And does who succés winning more then they lose i can count on my other hand.
I know not one person which  say 10 years back tryed to learn some AP way, but failed and find good excuse - VB and bias - not works.
Of course is very hard to recognize - that am not enough educated,that it is me who was not able to learn, much simplier to claim - all that is s*** and not work :) .
I talked with few such guys and found that they not have understanding what is that VB and bias and in which way it creates advantage.
Usually they readed some writings from different sellers and think that readed writings of Gods :)
I several times wrote - who can win - do that, who cant - try to teach others :) , by selling something.

So advice to all these, who talks that physic not works - think what you talk and think who are you , have you enough education for such claimings :) .... ?
« Last Edit: September 03, 2018, 12:11:52 PM by Bebediktus »
 

MrPerfect.

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #26 on: September 03, 2018, 08:12:50 PM »
All these who can not win do have same problem - they are lazy and do not wanna work. Not only work, they are unable to think for themselves. 
   Lazy people do wait others to make for them all hard work and share results. Be it in books, forums, in development and case studies ...ets.
    Especially to filter lazy out , sellers/wrighters do place gaps in understanding.
   Almost every method available on the market does work and has potential to explore edge and create income for user.  Uwe, Laurence, Basieux, Jafco,  Pavliki, RRSYSTEM, they all are valid and working methods.  These methods used to work few years back and continue to work now.
   All of methods mentioned above do include a gap in understanding to filter lazy individuals. There is only one way to overcome this gap - personal hands on research.  It's a homework that needs to be done in order to become a winner.
  After homework done , all methods will make sense and player can understand what it is all about, but not before.
    Sputnik never made this homework, he got many good material to study, but couldn't be bothered to actually study.  Shame.
 

GIAJJENNO

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #27 on: September 03, 2018, 08:57:59 PM »
Maybe he doesnt want to study the AP.
 
The following users thanked this post: MrPerfect.

MrPerfect.

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #28 on: September 03, 2018, 09:24:19 PM »
Exactly,  GIA.  He just pretending to know something based on what he red all over. His understanding is close to zero due to the luck of actually doing the thing. And doing is required in order to master.
   It's same as someone who red books about driving during 10 years, but never actually drive anything. That's why l say it's a shame.
    Not only that. He distributes other people materials " to share costs" . What can result from such "help"?  I myself, for example, was shared jafco materials. I red them and missed few very important things needed in order to understand how jafco vb works. I red many times, but actually understood his method only after speaking few times with jafco himself and seeing in real time how he predicts.
  Same happen with RRSYS. I red it ... but only understood after speaking with its creator and watching him playing in real time. ...
    It's just how the things are... people know physics or they do not, they do homework in order to understand... or not.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2018, 09:43:12 PM by MrPerfect. »
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO

GIAJJENNO

Re: GIAJJENNO SPORT BETTING DISCUSSON
« Reply #29 on: February 23, 2019, 08:04:54 PM »
Hi sport bettors,

My question is:

Do you use some progression under bettings? I marked, that my most losing  streak was around 7 in few hundred tips, I am a little above, around 55% strike rate at odds 2,00 avarage. In this case, should I prefer to use some progression to improve my winnings? I started the Fberuary psoted on tipstertube too, from a bad start I am now at profit. In 2018 I had only 2 losing months, bad these was quite big losings, and some low winnings, but in the year end, I closed the year in profit. With my friend I will start soon our own webpage, but my friend I know, that he is worse, than me unfortunately. But he is big marketinger, a huge marketinger, so people follows me in FB groups, because of his. A year ago I get one opportunity to post in a group with 10,000+ memebrs, where hungarian tipsters raced with each others. I had to say, I had the msot likes, they folowed me the most. I had such a good winning streak, with analyzes matches, I had around from 9 match 8 win, and 1 avoid, that after my 10th post I had 30 second since posting 100 likes, after 2 hours I had 500 likes. At this time I felt I am the Hungarian Betmaster ;D  But the group was deleted, the tispters scattered, and me, and my friend started our own group, with greeat success, but after a losing month, and osme losing streaks many have gone.

So after a little  story, should I use example Holloway progression or somth else?  :)

Giaj