Every group of numbers have a chance of occurrence, but there is not a group with a better chance.

Please explain "a better chance".

What do you mean with "why do you now use the first 3 as virtual bets".

My SSB system is not better than others, but I challenge the forum for a better presented system.

1 )

In my ( block there are 36 possibilities of 3 being correct but only 4 have a chance after 2 spins .Threfore some groups have a better chance than others.

2)

In one of your earlier posts you said you used the first 3 spins f your system as "virtual bets " ?

3)

If you challenge others to present a BETTER system than yours then , clearly, you think yours is the best . If all you meant was that you were inviting others to present their system then you should have omitted " better " .

Further, I think you have misunderstood Blaise Pascal here. He was referring to the POSSIBILITIES of each and every " spin" being correct while you are only looking for oly 1 to win .So I think you are overpaying here . Real, correctly IMO, made the point that there were only 37 Possibilities in each and every spin. What he failed to see was that it is the mathematicians who talk of the escalation - not we gamblers. We gamblers " Take Chances " in roulette. Mathematicians don't

But if any member does NOT want to Take A Chance -or think they will eventually lose - what the hell are they here for ?