New Forum Address: ROULETTELIFE.COM
  Update your Bookmarks

Author Topic: Nine Waves  (Read 8111 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Reyth

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2017, 07:17:14 PM »
The forced loss is -1200 units which is a table bank.

There is however:

1) Small Loss -- 2+ progression losses, scrap back to less than -100
2) Emergency Bailout -- 700-800 debt, successively lower until -300 to -400
3) Mini Bailout -- between Small Loss and Emergency Bailout but ended because of slower recovery at -100 to -200

These 3 are to avoid counter swings and also avoid the forced loss.

I think this is definitely workable and there are many options available for tweaking.

Thanks for your input King Ignatus! :D
« Last Edit: April 10, 2017, 07:20:23 PM by Reyth »
 
The following users thanked this post: ignatus, zibaanna

Rinad

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #31 on: April 11, 2017, 02:33:50 AM »


  Reyth, just finishing reading the whole thread of your 9 waves system. a lot of hard work you have done there.
I see that playing for real money did not turn out well. I am just curious. do you trust the casino you played out of ?   was it a online casino?

the system seems like it performed so well for so long I am surprise it did what it did, and makes you doubt your performance. you had a lot of practice with it. strange coincidence.
God bless,
Rinad
 

Reyth

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #32 on: April 11, 2017, 03:07:49 AM »
Hey thanks Rinad!

Yes, I trust the online casino I play at, I know someone that has a winning system that plays there.

I am aghast at what happened and I have no way to actually prove if it is a coincidence or not.  I think it has got to be the most bizarre thing, timing wise -- I just don't know.

The system can be tweaked and improved to reduce risk because it generates profit quite strongly.

In the future I just can't afford to trust non-money spins; if I don't get hammered by the "toy RNG" then it is only the entry level to an acceptable system.  Ideally I should always be using real money spins to seriously test, at all times.
 

Jake007

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #33 on: May 12, 2017, 06:00:59 PM »
Reyth... I dont understand, can you help explain? So you were playing all of this with test credits or with real money? And also... if you were up 12,000 units and suffered some defeats, I dont see a big deal.

However, I will tell you I notice a difference when I play test credits vs. real credits. Its not necessarily a huge difference, but playing over time I notice it. I cant pinpoint it other than saying profit doesnt come as fast. I should do an analysis of say 1000+ spins with test vs. real credits. Would be interesting.
 

Reyth

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #34 on: May 12, 2017, 06:17:54 PM »
I was using a simulator and not casino spins and every time I switched to casino spins, I would notice larger drawdowns and more frequent losses.

I basically let this go because it is less efficient than it can be, even though it works really well.  The increased losses make it not as worth it, as was first apparent.
 

mr j

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #35 on: August 08, 2018, 09:43:36 PM »
Too many numbers bet.
Ken
 

mr j

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #36 on: August 09, 2018, 01:45:54 AM »
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSoqed9v2Ds << If you dont see/hear this at the CAGE on a regular basis, take up BINGO.
 

anil26

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #37 on: August 09, 2018, 02:55:38 AM »
Hi
I am sorry but I dint understand how to bet

And dint understand raise +1 units until 5 chips

We bet one first street 1 units twice
Then raise 1 units, then confused

Can somebody just explain how to bet step by step in a simple way
Thanks
 

anil26

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #38 on: August 09, 2018, 03:57:23 AM »
Please discard my last post
I got it ;D
 

GIAJJENNO

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #39 on: August 09, 2018, 09:13:05 PM »
My first tests easy session wins (4/4).What is my question, that wouldnt be a better to NOT double the chips after losing one a session (debt -75)? Because would be harder to gain a profit after example losing a session at double chips (-225). Minimum 5 session to make it at least even. About what Reyth posted, his session winrate was I think over 85-90%. In this case I think its unneccessary to raise chips after losing a session.
 
The following users thanked this post: funtomas76

funtomas76

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #40 on: August 10, 2018, 04:33:44 AM »
It is rare loosing level 2 with -225. When I have winnings in level 2 and i am back under 75 units lost, than i go back to level 1. When I am at level 3 and have winnings that bring me back under minus 225 I go back from level 3 to level 2. And so on. Safety first.
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO

GIAJJENNO

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #41 on: August 10, 2018, 06:53:59 AM »
Yes its rare, but sure happens. Why its not better just continue playing with same chips, like flat play? Less win, but less drawdowns.
 

funtomas76

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #42 on: August 10, 2018, 08:42:58 AM »
You can test only play level 1 until -75. Than stop.
Two winning sessions will bring your losses back.
 

GIAJJENNO

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #43 on: August 10, 2018, 10:46:41 AM »
Yes. How is this system performs you? Do you win consistently? Where do you play it, real casino b and m or airball or online?
 

funtomas76

Re: Nine Waves
« Reply #44 on: August 10, 2018, 03:01:39 PM »
I play online only at live dealer roulette with full bankroll of 1200 units. No loss so far.
And I play in real casino at touchscreen airball one time a week. There I only play with bankroll 200 units. Most of the time it's enough to hit the target. If lost I take the 200 lost units from my online account so in fact nothing bad happened.  :)
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO