New Forum Address: ROULETTELIFE.COM
  Update your Bookmarks

Author Topic: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN  (Read 96164 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

palestis

  • Great Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 850
  • Thanked: 810 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #585 on: December 18, 2017, 12:44:55 AM »
If the live dealer online casino is out of a studio, then I wouldn't trust it. As opposed to live dealer, live players like Dublin Bet.
Whenever you encounter consecutive trigger losses (@3 spins each), you should take a look at the numbers. Maybe you would discover yet another red flag. If I  had the numbers from that session, maybe I could figure it out.
But I am sure that whenever you encounter more than 2 consecutive trigger losses, there is usually a tsunami of straight wins within one trigger that follows. . If you noticed that , maybe a higher starting unit is justified, after consecutive trigger losses. 
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth, jekhb76

sam41

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Thanked: 130 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #586 on: December 18, 2017, 06:23:39 PM »
Hi Pales

Why do you not trust online live dealers? Surely they aren't able to display a different number to individual players than what really came up? Or is it more to do with disconnections and funny things going on during progression betting?
 

palestis

  • Great Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 850
  • Thanked: 810 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #587 on: December 19, 2017, 12:12:34 AM »
I specified on line live dealer out of a studio, where no live players are present. (Like William hill).
Sure they can't cater a number to an individual player other than the actual number that came for all players.
But they can sure bring a number that's a losing number for a marked player. Even if they have to pay someone else big. They will deal with him later.
If they determine that a certain player has a consistent winning record (either thru a system or AP), then they can try to sabotage him. by bringing a number that is not covered by that player.
With today's video technologies, it is possible if you operate out of a studio.
I am not saying that this is what is actually happening, ( it's a legitimate guess), but on the other hand, I can't see an online casino paying a player long after it has been determined that he has been winning for a long time beyond good luck or coincidence.
I had several personal experiences where after an established winning record, internet disconnections or live stream has been switched to RNG in the middle of a game. With new numbers that had nothing to do with the numbers the system was relying on  at the time.
If your B/R has gone down before you completed all the progression steps, switching from live to RNG destroys the system because different numbers will show up on the RNG board.
Or they can simply disconnect you long enough to abandon your system before you finish the progression.
That way your loss stays, Then they can do the same when the circumstances are similar.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2017, 12:16:26 AM by palestis »
 
The following users thanked this post: kav, MrPerfect.

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4393
  • Thanked: 1615 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #588 on: December 19, 2017, 06:29:08 AM »
Ya, if that happened to me, I would be forced to spin until the statistics mirrored that of the disconnection and then continue my progression.  Any new random stream will disrupt the statistical flow of the numbers.
 

jekhb76

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
  • Thanked: 468 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #589 on: December 22, 2017, 06:38:04 AM »
This System never failed me as of het, but now i only play this System in a real casino with a live dealer and 5 unit bet size. Online casino's can be ok but Just for fun and a quick play session, but for real investment i never Trust online play. Like i said this System has never failed for me, but you must Keep to the rules and flags to be succesful.
 
The following users thanked this post: kav, MickyP

palestis

  • Great Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 850
  • Thanked: 810 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #590 on: December 22, 2017, 04:31:24 PM »
That's good news.
I went to a casino yesterday (Twin River RI), and after seeing 2 virtually lost triggers already showing on the board. I started betting the 2nd dozen. I lost the 3 bets of the 3rd trigger plus one bet from the 4th trigger.
Then I loaded up the 2nd dozen inside its numbers. and 13 came.
But to my dismay I found out that instead of betting 13-14-15 of the 2nd dozen, I bet 25-26-27- in the 3rd dozen. ( the numbers were all covered and failed to estimate the position of the 13-14-15 street in the 2nd dozen. I mistook  16-27 as the second dozen   and lost an opportunity to make a big hit.
 
 
The following users thanked this post: kav

sam41

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Thanked: 130 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #591 on: December 23, 2017, 12:45:10 PM »
The thing with online wheels is I see some of the amounts other players are winning and its way beyond what I'm doing. Every spin you see winners flash up who have won 4 figure sums. Ok we don't know what they bet or if they even made a loss but high rollers like that are surely a greater concern to the casino than little old me who at most would stop after winning £100-200 in a session. I suppose if you keep winning every day they might want to bust you, but if you play at a different casino every day for that sort of amount I can't imagine they'd target you? Plus what are they doing to target someone, using magnets? It just seems quite improbable - I thought the whole point was their house edge is always going to see them win in the end and they can tolerate a small percentage of players that win consistently as they are still raking it in from all the red/black marty losers?

 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

dobbelsteen

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1607
  • Thanked: 579 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #592 on: December 27, 2017, 11:05:36 AM »
The big spenders on the roulette table are the insite wager players who cover nearly the whole table. The random players lose all together 2,7% of the total small bets. The experience player uses the Marty principle in his benefit.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Reyth

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4393
  • Thanked: 1615 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #593 on: December 28, 2017, 07:17:24 AM »
Here is 133 units profit in 300 spins, doing just that while risking 255 units:

https://roulette-simulator.info/game/029a28219b3580d8496e73f1f16fc60c

There is a reason that there is large divergence between EC pairs. :D

I quit because my fingers got tired.  I wanted to go out to the full 255 units profit.

Its possible to play the Marty with controlled risk but a larger overall total balance is required which is more than just 255 units. ;)

Sorry, don't mean to hijack this thread.  I just felt suddenly inspired by Dobble's post. :D
« Last Edit: December 28, 2017, 07:26:06 AM by Reyth »
 

ice789

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 30
  • Thanked: 8 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #594 on: January 01, 2018, 07:56:10 PM »
i want test

wait for repeat dozen

ex

1
1
bet 1 three times if lose wait for repeat dozen

1
0
1
2
2 bet 2 three times
1 LOSE
1 LOSE
3 LOSE if lose wait for repeat dozen
2
3
3 bet 3 three times
1 LOSE
2 LOSE
3 WIN

i want rx code

i want check max lose ?

sorry i speak english little
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 07:11:48 AM by kav »
 

kav

  • www.Roulette30.com
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • Thanked: 1179 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #595 on: January 07, 2018, 06:48:00 AM »
I just read this enthusiastic feedback from jek about this system on another topic: https://forum.roulette30.com/index.php?topic=1181.msg29056#msg29056

I would like to ask jek to summarize here the rules if possible, that produced so amazing results for him.
Thanks Palestis!
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76

jekhb76

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
  • Thanked: 468 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #596 on: January 07, 2018, 07:04:38 AM »
I never did anything strange other then following the original rules provider by Palestis. I never adjusted the rules, Just used my mind and following the Flow. I must say that for this System i do use a 1000 euro bankroll! I know that 500 units can be enough. But i like to play it on the Safe side. I only use a divisor for keeping the bad runs in balance. Mostly i aim for a profit of 100 euro daily. But Most of the Times i Make way beyond that, and i play daily. But i play 3 or 4 sessions of a Target profit of 25+ units. Then i go home and come Back later. Maybe that's why i Always win. ;)  a daily profit of 100 euro minimum is a 2800 euro steady income. And that's when i Have a bad day ;D  mostly i Make between 100-300 euro daily.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2018, 07:07:31 AM by jekhb76 »
 
The following users thanked this post: kav, ShadowBlue, GIAJJENNO, MickyP

jekhb76

  • Mature Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 418
  • Thanked: 468 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #597 on: January 07, 2018, 07:10:50 AM »
I Have stopped working the normal way a Long Long Time ago.  8)
 
The following users thanked this post: GIAJJENNO

kav

  • www.Roulette30.com
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • Thanked: 1179 times
  • Gender: Male
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #598 on: January 07, 2018, 07:14:00 AM »
Thanks for the report jek,
How do you use the divisor?
Did you have any complete loss sessions/days?
 

valvo

  • New
  • **
  • Posts: 15
  • Thanked: 7 times
Re: NEW SYSTEM: SINGLE DOZEN
« Reply #599 on: January 08, 2018, 03:08:39 AM »
Hi Jekhb, What did you mean by

I have stopped working the normal way a long long time ago?

Also can you guide me to the post with the rules you play?  I gather its the very first on page 1, just clarifying.

And what divisor do you use as Kav asked above ?

Thanks

Val