New Forum Address: ROULETTELIFE.COM
  Update your Bookmarks

Author Topic: MEGALINE  (Read 819 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dklee100

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2018, 09:34:16 PM »

just play it roulette extreme or equivalent....

it seems to work 

yes you could lose 1 2 3 even 4 but play through per the method to achieve a + 1 on the balance then start over.
It seems to work....
 

scepticus

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #16 on: September 29, 2018, 09:44:57 PM »
It SEEMS to work ? ??did you play this  with REAL money or PLAY money DK?
 

BlueAngel

  • I always express my opinion
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1860
  • Thanked: 311 times
  • Gender: Male
  • Do you want truth? You cannot handle the truth!
Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #17 on: September 29, 2018, 09:53:05 PM »
Oh boy, gimme a credit line!!!  8)
 
The following users thanked this post: dklee100

dklee100

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #18 on: September 29, 2018, 10:15:15 PM »

always play at genting casino usually £500  hard cash no rng 
I use roulette extreme to trial and get used to a system 
worked a treat today plus +£470 
This is why I'm asking is it good 
If not say and Ill save some REAL money?

 

dklee100

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #19 on: September 29, 2018, 10:26:58 PM »

There is no holy grail?

So the next best thing must be a regular earner?

Is this not a regular winner?

Its simple seems effective could be improved? Yes of course ideas please?

 

scepticus

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #20 on: September 29, 2018, 11:31:00 PM »
DKIf you won real money of £470 then it works. So why doyou need advice ?
 All systems work - until they don't ! Just carry on betting it and you will find out whether or not it works.
Ignatus is a prolific system maker .About  one a month I would say !He is well meaning but provides so many ideas but if his first ,second or third system was profitable why not stick with it ?My opinion is that it won't show an  overall profit . But that is only my opinion BUT - I am biased against negative progressions so perhaps some other member/s can give you advice on it .
 

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2018, 02:51:02 AM »
ok I tested this a few times on roulette simulator  and lost - went to 6 double  -lost - -(-600) bankroll.  the 2DS that made me lose came like this - 17,14,18,,24,20,15,20
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j, scepticus

ignatus

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2018, 05:43:41 AM »
ok I tested this a few times on roulette simulator  and lost - went to 6 double  -lost - -(-600) bankroll.  the 2DS that made me lose came like this - 17,14,18,,24,20,15,20

Ok, fine. Then you know what BR would be needed? / and where the stoploss should be?..
 

sam41

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2018, 06:32:38 PM »
Isn't the idea to bet the last 4 lines that hit though? So you would have won easily when the 2 middle dozen lines began to hit consecutively? That's how i'd do it anyway, keep updating the lines as a new one shows and drop the one that's now 5 spins ago.  Also perhaps the best way would be find a wheel already showing 4 different lines in the last 4 spins or even 5 then start betting. If you have bank for 5 doubling ups you need 124 units but only 60 to play 4 spins so perhaps play for a virtual loss first? It will take longer to find the right conditions of course.

My issue with this method is the rather meager winnings, just 2 units on the first spin then break even next, then after that being down even with a win.
 

scepticus

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #24 on: September 30, 2018, 08:59:36 PM »
I agree samFirst and second are the only ones to show a profit unless you then introduce a progression .  And THAT can cause problems . I think you would need to have a good Bet Selection idea to have a chance of profit with this.
 

sam41

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #25 on: September 30, 2018, 11:00:31 PM »
That's where the advantage can be in betting 1 line as a repeater, then 2 then 3. However I imagine doing that will regularly put you 6 units down even though sometimes it will win. Statistically it's no better than betting a DS, a dozen and an even chance and we all know that would lose in the long run. It's interesting that lots of positive results have materialised so far though. Has much research been done into how often/how long a DS goes to sleep for? Perhaps this method is winning by way of an edge being created by avoiding a sleeping DS therefore limiting losing opportunities to only one other DS or the 0. However there are also times no DS is sleeping so I still find this one hard to view as a long term winner.
 
The following users thanked this post: kav

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #26 on: October 01, 2018, 03:36:33 PM »
im getting better results as u suggested (sam41) I am adding the last DS and minus the first DS .. keeping 4 at all times ..maybe I was playing it wrong - -ill keep testing
 

Mako

Re: MEGALINE
« Reply #27 on: October 03, 2018, 06:10:11 PM »
That's where the advantage can be in betting 1 line as a repeater, then 2 then 3. However I imagine doing that will regularly put you 6 units down even though sometimes it will win. Statistically it's no better than betting a DS, a dozen and an even chance and we all know that would lose in the long run. It's interesting that lots of positive results have materialised so far though. Has much research been done into how often/how long a DS goes to sleep for? Perhaps this method is winning by way of an edge being created by avoiding a sleeping DS therefore limiting losing opportunities to only one other DS or the 0. However there are also times no DS is sleeping so I still find this one hard to view as a long term winner.

Only had a chance to quick-test this twice, did it using last hit 4 to avoid sleepers and it won twice easily.

DS can sleep for 30+ spins, which means I would always do it that way personally.  Will try to devote some time to it for fun later this week.