New Forum Address: ROULETTELIFE.COM
  Update your Bookmarks

Author Topic: Palestis' DS trends  (Read 6596 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jekhb76

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #30 on: December 12, 2017, 10:31:14 PM »
That is also An option
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

MickyP

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #31 on: December 13, 2017, 12:42:54 AM »
The rule says to only increase the wager on a win.
If your total wager gets too big you can bet a chip on zero as insurance.

Jekhb76 plays until a new high then resets. A new high will mostly be reached while the total chips bet is still relatively small.

Reyth, will adding an extra chip on all play positions not over expose you to potential downswings? Sometimes zeros appear in packs.
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76

Reyth

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #32 on: December 13, 2017, 01:04:36 AM »
My reasoning behind raising is that we just took a loss and I haven't raised like we normally do -- this leaves a profit gap and so I fill it with a raise all around. 

Any number can appear in packs and because the zero has appeared, the static chances of it appearing again are reduced and the chances of it appearing again increase with each new spin. 

The chances of a single number repeating several times in close proximity is much lower than previously proven DS's that are hot or even just a group of DS's regardless of their history.

That's just how I think about it. :)
« Last Edit: December 13, 2017, 08:23:07 AM by Reyth »
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76, MickyP

jekhb76

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #33 on: December 13, 2017, 07:14:21 AM »
Is still remains roulette guys. Every number has equal changes to reappear as much as any other. If a Zero Comes, the changes that the Zero wil hit again is Just as High as any other number. Further More, when i reset after a new High i Let the Wheel spin virtualy so i Will optain a fresh ds to start playing. Just don't set your session goals to High. For me a session goal is reached when i Have 10% profit of my Total bankroll. So when you play with 1 dollar chips the bankroll is 100 dollar and the session End when 10 dollar profit is reached. Just An example on hoe i play this System. I usualy quit when i Have 3 Times won my session goals. Not one session lost so dat. And i play this System on rng. Just for fun, and it pays very good. So this System is also save for Low down sunday afternoons behind the pc or tablet. ????
 

Reyth

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #34 on: December 13, 2017, 08:25:36 AM »
The way I see it, the entire board is more likely to hit than the last number, from a static probability perspective.
 
The following users thanked this post: jekhb76

MickyP

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #35 on: December 13, 2017, 01:52:11 PM »
Wow! Below is a sequence of numbers, "live spin data from the net". Please test the system on these numbers and share your results.
24
8
29
21
16
34
3
15
36
3
26
15
36
4
19
14
12
5
35
23
6
26
22
10
22
20
9
12
15
11
13
17
18
35
14
20
32
31
21
32
18
30
34
7
2
9
34
36
18
31
22
30
9
21
19
16
7
19
0
11
0
25
30
1
23
0
1
10
27
30
6
3
31
1
34
14.

Palestis, will you be able to test these numbers  and give advice based on the test results?
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

jekhb76

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #36 on: December 13, 2017, 06:01:54 PM »
 :D nice

 

MickyP

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #37 on: December 13, 2017, 06:51:07 PM »
I tested the system with the numbers above but did not bet on the zero as advised.

This is a good example of zeros appearing in a group.
 

jekhb76

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #38 on: December 13, 2017, 09:20:05 PM »
Better to Always bet o a Zero for insurance. Lesser profit, but safer and when a Zero hits, your session is done with a big profit.

 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth, MickyP

jekhb76

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #39 on: December 13, 2017, 09:23:51 PM »
The Zero would Have Made 108 dollar profit for you in the above example. You van also count the Zero as a ds on it's own.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

Reyth

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #40 on: December 13, 2017, 10:20:49 PM »
Ya I dunno when we are supposed to cover the 0 but I do it once I have 6 units on bet.
 

palestis

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #41 on: December 13, 2017, 10:45:49 PM »

Palestis, will you be able to test these numbers  and give advice based on the test results?
I will test it but it's not an easy job.
I have to check every number manually looking out for dots next to the DS's and the pluses and minuses as the numbers advance
 

Reyth

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #42 on: December 13, 2017, 11:03:24 PM »
I hope u will let us know about Harry... :(
 

palestis

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #43 on: December 13, 2017, 11:54:34 PM »
We keep in touch daily via email. But we don't talk about systems anymore because other things are on his mind. I also get emails from his daughter in law when he is unable to write.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

palestis

Re: Palestis' DS trends
« Reply #44 on: December 14, 2017, 12:13:11 AM »
@MickyP
I processed these numbers.
It wasn't the best situation as it is obvious from these numbers.
But by quitting and starting over after a minimum profit, it would still be a positive end result.
It took many numbers from 24 to 18 (the 18 that it is about the 40th number after 21-32) to show a positive result, which was +2 units.
In this case a +2 result is very welcome because the game had turned sour from the beginning and it kept eating up units. In this case a small positive result or even a small loss is welcome.
The 2nd positive result came from 30-31. 41st number to 49th number on your list. +6.
The 3rd positive result was from 22-19 (5 numbers with +8 outcome).
Then the rest of the session  would have a very small loss due to the 3   0's. But if you bet on the 0 after it appeared it would've been a great positive result.
If these numbers were the worst case scenario, then the system performed very well, despite the failure to set a trend on a few DS's
But I always simplified the DS's to their absolute minimum if I had to bet on all 6 DS's.
And always restart after a profit, no matter how small.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth, MickyP