Roulette Forum

Roulette Forum => Roulette Strategy Discussion => Topic started by: Sputnik on October 28, 2015, 04:43:57 PM

Title: Worst and extreme - even money bets
Post by: Sputnik on October 28, 2015, 04:43:57 PM
I play by hand and got 3.0 SD against me and i continue and got some regression without fully recover from the 3.0 SD and then i face 2.5 SD again against me.
So i got a hell twice and still recover all loses and break even.

First was 14 loses and 2 wins and the secound was 12 loses and 2 wins - LOL this feel great :-)
This progression use differcification very good with spread of risk (assests) ...

With this methodology you need to win among the first 50/100 - because if you get into hell you might need 200 to recover.

(https://www.roulettelife.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi66.tinypic.com%2F11lj3uv.jpg&hash=6f5a2bb326a0599ec9be79edb60facdb)

(https://www.roulettelife.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi67.tinypic.com%2Fke6vtg.jpg&hash=861a18da6fcd6c4ba54cb528464a5d90)
Title: Re: Worst and extreme - even money bets
Post by: dobbelsteen on October 29, 2015, 08:56:39 AM
Sory I have no idea what you are doing. Most visitors of this forum do not possess that testprogram. Without a clear explanation of the background of the graph your contribution has no learn valid.
Title: Re: Worst and extreme - even money bets
Post by: Sputnik on October 29, 2015, 12:36:53 PM
 What you see is a progression that overcome 26 loses, that is what the first chart show.
 Second you see 14 series contra 2 singles, same as 3.0 SD.
 There is as many series as there is singles.
 With red & black it would have been 14 black and 2 red, also 3.0 SD.

I post this at other forum and they fully understand the concept.
Should also mention that the drawdown with 80 units is very small.
Title: Re: Worst and extreme - even money bets
Post by: dobbelsteen on October 29, 2015, 04:56:35 PM
Please publish your progression. 26 double up is impossibele, so it is not a Martingale progression.
Can you also make a graph of the bets?