Using the framework but back to an EC only, I went up 2400 units (10 in a row) after going down 55% of my bank, to over double it.

This has gotten me thinking about maximizing the effectiveness of the framework to delay as long as possible until that massive up swing should hit.

The following method suggests itself and seems to be working well:

**1) Spin until your favorite EC hits****2) Bet 2 units on that EC****3) Raise 1 unit on each hit until it misses****4) Back to spinning without betting until your favorite EC hits again**Since the Paroli makes its real profit with the major streaks (4 and above), missing a single hit at only 1 unit will not make any major difference but instead will save money against the incessant losing spins and the zero.

11 streaks in a row is 405/1000000 or 1 in 2469 attempts (+53)

10 streaks in a row is 1532/1900000 or 1 in 1240 attempts (+43)

9 streaks in a row is 4024/2500000 or 1 in 621 attempts (+34)

8 streaks in a row is 9929 /3000000 or 1 in 302 attempts (+26)

7 streaks in a row is 24556/3600000 or 1 in 147 attempts (+19)

6 streaks in a row is 56000/4000000 or 1 in 71 attempts (+16)

5 streaks in a row is 143846/5000000 or 1 in 35 attempts (+8)

4 streaks in a row is 328377/5500000 or 1 in 17 attempts (+4)

**3 streaks in a row is 729470/6000000 or 1 in 8 attempts (+1) <=== what do I spy with my little eye?**2 streak in a row is 1624262/6500000 or 1 in 4 attempts (-1)

**1 Unit Expectation**L1(-2) L2(-2) L3(-2) W4()

L5(-2) L6(-2) L7(-2) W8() W9()

L10(-2) L11(-2) W12()

L13(-2) L14(-2) L15(-2) W16() W17()

L18(-2) L19(-2) W20()

L21(-2) L22(-2) L23(-2) W24() W25()

L26(-2) L27(-2) W28()

L29(-2) L30(-2) L31(-2) W32() W33() W34() W35()

**Paroli Hack Method**This method is based on sound roulette hacking principles that are normally blocked by the casino table limits but here there is no such concern; at least not yet in the testing thus far.

**Using the method described above (steps 1-4), when you fulfill step 1 (the EC hits), calculate ([DEBT]+1)+2 and bet 1/2 of this amount. If it misses start over but if it hits bet your first bet PLUS 1/2 of your first bet. If it misses start over but if it hits you are guaranteed to be at a new all time high. Of course keep on raising the unit amount which is now (PROFIT-1) until you finally lose.**2.....-2

2.....-4(2)

=================

3.....-7

5.....-12

7.....-19(5)

=================

11.....-30

16.....-46

24.....-70[8] <=== EXPECTATION

=================

36.....-106

54.....-160

81.....-241(11)

=================

122.....-363

184.....-547

275.....-822(14)

=================

412.....-1234

618.....-1852

927.....-2779(17)

=================

1391.....-4170

2085.....-6255

3130.....-9385(20)

=================

4694.....-14079

7041.....-21120

10561.....-31681(23)

==================

15842.....-47523

23763.....-71286(25)

==================

The reasoning behind this is that a profitable bet sequence (3 in a row) is expected to occur once every 8 tries and it seems like it occurs more often than that. Besides this, it is also based on "misdirection" where we are aiming for the lowest payout possible (only 2 bet hits in a row) but meanwhile face odds for as many as 23 bet hits in a row! That is exciting and especially because our trigger is so accessible.

I haven't put raster beam to pixel on this yet but it all depends on how bad variance can get with this vs. the bankroll...

I think the worst it can be expected to get is between 124 and 101 straight misses; this is based on the 12% chance of a hit which is the equivalent of 4 or 5 bet numbers. It seems to hit so often though, I wonder if this is a miscalculation somehow... Yes it now occurs to me that the correct answer is found here:

https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php?topic=476.msg5469#msg5469Because all we are really looking for is 2 EC's in a row. This means we need a bankroll large enough to handle 55 consecutive misses which actually sounds like quite a tall order to fill...

**The above progression is a full 30 bets shy of the required 54 successive loss events which would require a trigger of 30 successive loss events to bet successfully... So the rule would be that any time any EC has 30 successive loss events (no 3 hits in a row) the above progression can be used to generate an expected profit. So the software here would monitor all 6 EC's; each time they hit but result in less than 3 in a row, the counter is advanced. Once a counter reaches 30, its time to bet the Paroli!**

The question is how common is this 30 successive loss event trigger? I will find out soon... NOTE: Yes of course, this is a raising loop tied 100% to the bankroll which means certain death once variance gets a hold of it and yes it does.... >.<