Author Topic: Double streets method  (Read 3493 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

petespin

Double streets method
« on: February 14, 2019, 03:59:30 PM »
If there were a system tha t produces 1000u in every 1000 spins based on d.streets is it a good one ?  With other words generates 1 u per spin on average ! I know that many of u 'll  get me wrong to ask a question like that Becoz the answer is obvious but I really want to see if anyone here has anything better playing at this RANGE ( double streets ) of roulette ??
 
The following users thanked this post: Third, Stratege

scepticus

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2019, 04:09:18 PM »
I don't think any other method would be BETTER , Pete. I think tou HAVE found the HG  ;D
 

Stratege

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2019, 05:16:56 PM »

Petespin, 1000 u in 1000 spins it's great !
But does this profit say nothing about your bankroll ? Thank you for telling us your bankroll.  ;)
 

petespin

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2019, 05:21:13 PM »
Stratege  no more than 100 u is my life time br!
 

Greek

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2019, 05:21:33 PM »
Yes, 60 units per 16 spins.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2019, 05:23:48 PM by Greek »
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

petespin

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2019, 05:25:06 PM »
Greek your maths is wrong !
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

Stratege

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2019, 05:35:24 PM »

Petespin, your results are exceptional with such a small bankroll. But one last question.
Your tested sample is how many times 1000 spins ?
 

petespin

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2019, 05:43:54 PM »
I can't say more about my bet selection or I 'll reveal how I play, but its tested long enough , u can't imagine how simple is to beat roulette , only thing u need is to find the right " number" !
 
The following users thanked this post: Third, Stratege

scepticus

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2019, 07:27:09 PM »
Oh !  Pete    You have diluted   my enthusiasm  !
100 units lifetime bank ?
You need  to find the right number ?
 

Greek

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2019, 09:22:54 PM »
Greek your maths is wrong !
Sorry my error.
It's 84 units per 16 spins, 5.25 units per spin.
 

leowls

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2019, 11:40:39 PM »
What's the point of such boasting thread again where it serves nothing other than than to boost your ego and wasting bandwidth of the site?
 

Mako

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2019, 12:47:44 AM »
What's the point of such boasting thread again where it serves nothing other than than to boost your ego and wasting bandwidth of the site?

Possibly to sell it to those who PM him who are curious. That allows posters to get around forum rules.

Not saying petespin is doing this, I have no idea. 

Lurkers: Never buy information or pay for roulette help, from anyone.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2019, 12:51:17 AM by Mako »
 
The following users thanked this post: mr j, MickyP, leowls

Greek

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2019, 05:17:03 AM »
...I really want to see if anyone here has anything better playing at this RANGE ( double streets ) of roulette ?
You know there will always be someone who can have a better playing RANGE. Did you want to know how many players have a better range? So far, count me as one.
 
The following users thanked this post: Third

petespin

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2019, 08:45:45 AM »
Greek I don't think there will be many guys that have better results playing outside bets! Let me guess u re not one of them !
 

Greek

Re: Double streets method
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2019, 09:00:21 AM »
Greek I don't think there will be many guys that have better results playing outside bets! Let me guess u re not one of them !
You would be surprised with my outside EC skills. Slow and steady; but, it's boring. I use a different kind of approach when I play ECs, 18 numbers inside.
 
The following users thanked this post: Third