0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### ignatus

« on: June 09, 2018, 05:34:11 AM »

This, (to my suprise?) had a very good hitrate, low drawdown etc... perhaps one of my best? atleast i believe in that it can generate some \$\$\$ ....

Procedure (see pic!)

Progression; An ordinary 15numbers negative progression 1 1 2 3 6 10 17 29 50 86 147

OR ELSE (simplyfied 1 1 2 4 8 16....and so on)

The following users thanked this post: Jake007

#### GIAJJENNO

« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2018, 08:56:23 AM »
I think it will kill the bankroll too, the main question how much profit you can generate between the bust. Lets see example 50 session. And its just a minimum.

Anyway, thanks for the sharing

Giaj

#### Trilobite

« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2018, 09:19:03 AM »
You try some good ideas ignatus, but they are all so static.

You might find better success with more elastic ideas.

Take Goodspread for example. Why not swing the sectors back and forth, CW & CCW according to what number hits?
For example using the zero sector, If the zero hits then play your other three sectors as is. If 32 hits, shift the sectors one pocket CW and play those 15 numbers. If 15 hits, shift the sectors two pockets CW and play those 15 numbers. If 26 hits, shift the sectors one pocket CCW and play those 15 numbers. If 3 hits, shift the sectors two pocket CCW and play those 15 numbers.

Do the same for all sectors.

Anyway, don’t be lazy.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2018, 09:23:27 AM by Trilobite »

#### ignatus

« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2018, 09:35:19 AM »
Why not swing the sectors back and forth, CW & CCW according to what number hits?

It's a good betselection, and i've had good results so far, so you don't have to "switch sectors" in this case.(that doesn't increase hitrate)

i use a simple 1 1 2 4 8 16 32 64- progression (and i haven't gone beyond the 7th step)...

The following users thanked this post: Jake007

#### GIAJJENNO

« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2018, 11:49:14 AM »
But you will soon

#### MickyP

« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2018, 12:28:33 AM »
Ignatus; With all due respect, why this bet selection?  Because they are neighbors on the wheel? What nonsense!

You have selected 15 numbers to play excluding a zone where the ball landed last. Ask yourself, What motivates the call to cover the 15 numbers divided into the 3 sections you bet on? Why not seven numbers on either side of the fallen number? Come on, test it and give us a winning graph. I know you will.

Posting systems is all fair and well but please explain the bet selection. If you answer "Ï don't care, it works for me" then rather not post such misleading methods.

15 numbers is close to an EC bet so you rely on EXPECTATION to produce the goods and the winners sing your praise, but you simply encouraged betting more numbers for a win. How smart of you. No patterns, no triggers, no dealer signature, no past spins; What about the hot numbers? Are you playing against variance which apparently does not exist!

Don't encourage people to lose money because you did a computer test and showed a win. You don't play real roulette so you have no idea what it feels like to lose a bankroll on the whims of "a great roulette system developer". Be more conscientious about the haphazard methods you post.

All I've done is read through your method and as I frustrate others on the forum with my patterns and triggers you frustrate me and maybe others by not explaining the reason behind your bet selection. I have asked you this question on a few occasions but you either ignore me or you ignore the entire forum. If there is a reason to bet those specific numbers other than the fact that they represent the dials of a clock then please enlighten us.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2018, 12:30:56 AM by MickyP »

#### GIAJJENNO

« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2018, 01:34:15 AM »
Ignatus,

You posted here hundreds of systems, but:

You didnt play in real casino, or in real life?

Giaj

#### Trilobite

« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2018, 11:44:01 AM »
It's a good betselection, and i've had good results so far, so you don't have to "switch sectors" in this case.(that doesn't increase hitrate)

If you read my post with open eyes, I was not saying you should change your Goodspread BS. I was merely using it as an example of static versus elastic BS methods.

Perhaps it will help next time or maybe later. Until then by all means, carry on soldier.

#### Jake007

« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2018, 11:42:26 PM »
Micky! Seriously? His method was like one sentence Its not like you just spent an hour reading about spatiotemporal events only to find out it works awesome but you'll never see it

The following users thanked this post: mr j

#### Jake007

« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2018, 11:47:19 PM »
In any event I would love for Ignatus to tell us more about this system. Why the particular progression, why not different groups, etc. Example, if this was a live wheel I would bet the 5 group section that just hit and avoid the opposite side. So many times I see the ball land on the same number or same area again and again.

#### MickyP

« Reply #10 on: June 22, 2018, 02:38:51 AM »
Good luck.

#### MickyP

« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2018, 08:31:54 AM »
@Jake007, I have always found the methods Ignatus posts intriguing. On a few occasions I have politely asked him to explain the bet selection and my questions went unanswered. I like the idea behind this method and would also like to discuss it in more detail but judging from past experiences I know odds of this happening are small.
I may have put myself on his "no reply" list with my post above so if you are fortunate enough to get him to discuss it a bit more I will follow the discussion with interest.
No harm intended.

#### ignatus

« Reply #12 on: June 22, 2018, 10:31:41 AM »
@Jake007, I have always found the methods Ignatus posts intriguing. On a few occasions I have politely asked him to explain the bet selection and my questions went unanswered. I like the idea behind this method and would also like to discuss it in more detail but judging from past experiences I know odds of this happening are small.
I may have put myself on his "no reply" list with my post above so if you are fortunate enough to get him to discuss it a bit more I will follow the discussion with interest.
No harm intended.

Well? reason why, it haven't been played and tested enough, and it's up to everyone, test it themselves, (everybody likes to play it differently) so. that's why. short term i've had good result...