Author Topic: Split progression  (Read 1881 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

boyd30

Split progression
« on: January 31, 2018, 09:15:09 PM »
Does anyone know a good progression for one split? Also for four splits? Not Martingale but any other?

The Bedsit Botter

Re: Split progression
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2018, 09:34:16 PM »

Mild progression on split bet

1 unit 17 times
2 units 8 times
3 units 5 times
4 units 4 times
5 units 4 times
6 units 2 times
7 units 3 times
8 units 2 times
9 units 2 times
10 units 1 time (-1 if won here)
11 units 1 time
12 units 1 time
13 units 2 times
14 units 1 time
15 units 1 time
16 units 1 time
17 units 1 time

Total of 56 bets for 272 units staked.

The following users thanked this post: kav, boyd30

boyd30

Re: Split progression
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2018, 11:24:44 AM »
I've seen that progression before. But thanks anyway The Bedsit Botter!

Jesper

Re: Split progression
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2018, 01:33:48 PM »
A progression on a split, has to be slow,  a Marty type as suggested in the post before, is a very dangerous one.
I did just a play using one way which saves the chips if the hits delays.  They use to cluster at some  time, or we shift the bet to a split with running numbers.

We bet only one chip, until we hit, and even if we have to play 100 spins, we rather stop than increase the bet.

When we get a hit, we take the sum of last balance plus one, and subtract the current balance. If that is  not positive number, we are on new high else we use the diff and divide it with 15  round up. That 's the next bet.

We will allways come on new high, if we get a double hit, and we will also reach new high when the splits hits with short interval.

The play I did (see picture) has 2 units at highest bet.

Pls check the turnover and the net, rather good.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2018, 01:37:52 PM by Jesper »

The following users thanked this post: boyd30

boyd30

Re: Split progression
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2018, 07:37:18 PM »
Thank you Jesper! Interesting. Will study that kind of progression more.

Mike

Re: Split progression
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2018, 10:23:21 AM »

Mild progression on split bet

1 unit 17 times
2 units 8 times
3 units 5 times
4 units 4 times
5 units 4 times
6 units 2 times
7 units 3 times
8 units 2 times
9 units 2 times
10 units 1 time (-1 if won here)
11 units 1 time
12 units 1 time
13 units 2 times
14 units 1 time
15 units 1 time
16 units 1 time
17 units 1 time

Total of 56 bets for 272 units staked.

Mild? You've got to be kidding. This is nothing more than the equivalent of a martingale on splits because ONE recovers all losses and makes a profit. A mild progression would be something like Jesper suggests, or maybe you could increase by one unit every 10 spins or so if not in profit. But negative progressions are generally a bad idea.

Jesper

Re: Split progression
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2018, 11:25:46 AM »
Here is an other play. Once the split sleep for 62 spins.   Needed 263 spins to win 53 units. If we used the marty like progression it would bust.  The win is not so large, but I prefer a small win compare to a large loss.
Highest bet was 4 units.

If we think this is too conservative, we can divide with 14,13,or even 12, but the risk/reward changes.

(See pic)
« Last Edit: February 02, 2018, 11:32:23 AM by Jesper »

kav

• https://www.youtube.com/c/rouletteman
• Administrator
• Hero Member
• Posts: 2367
• Thanked: 1327 times
• Gender:
Re: Split progression
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2018, 01:06:00 PM »
Your progression is not clear from the image Jesper. What progression do you propose?

Jesper

Re: Split progression
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2018, 01:14:43 PM »
@Kav

I have used it in other post as well.

We bet the same size until a hit.  We calculate the difference between last balance and current after the hit.
Next bet is the difference divided with  15 or 16 if the bet is a split. That we keep until next hit. We return to 1 unit then on new high.

If we hit at a balance  -65, next bet size is 6  (65/15 = 5 (rounded up).
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 01:25:57 PM by Jesper »

The following users thanked this post: kav, boyd30

kav

• https://www.youtube.com/c/rouletteman
• Administrator
• Hero Member
• Posts: 2367
• Thanked: 1327 times
• Gender:
Re: Split progression
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2018, 01:19:18 PM »
Nice idea! Thanks
May I ask, where else have posted this method? (if it is easy to find)

Jesper

Re: Split progression
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2018, 01:21:20 PM »
The topic is how many spins to earn 100  units.

https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php?topic=2143.0

The following users thanked this post: kav

boyd30

Re: Split progression
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2018, 07:26:00 PM »
I don't know why you use 15 or 16 as it is a split. Should be 17, but maybe it can be to round it up easier. Just to write an example so I know I'm on right track, say we have 70 units loss on 1 unit bet. Then you win. So you divide 70/17= 4. You continue 30 more bets until you hit next time. 173/17=10. Then you go for 10 more bets before hit, 273/17 = 16. Hit after 2 times. + 163. The bets can  be quite high if the wins not coming.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 10:20:48 PM by kav »

Reyth

Re: Split progression
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2018, 07:33:46 PM »
I stay off the sleepers.  After a hit without profit, I switch to the top performing sleeper on the board.

https://roulette-simulator.info/game/bb8ac8c06345e7c611a4486c12760ae3

The following users thanked this post: kav

Jesper

Re: Split progression
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2018, 08:22:29 PM »
@boyd30

If the bet not hit for long, and that stand for many long gaps, it will be high bets. But that will go for any method.

Compare to what is usually used, this is a progression which seldom goes out of hands, and  if we put a stoploss of so many as 2000 units, it has a good chance to recover in the next sessions.  I have yet never lost using it, and it is used many times.

If a double hit, it will allways win. I use it most on streets and divide with 10.

I never say this can not lose, but the progression is very much better than many other.  Test it in fun over and over, and then you may see.

@Reyth

We are of course free to switch to numbers we think are hotter than the numbers we use for the last spins.
I do not speak of the selection of numbers, it is the staking plan.

« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 08:24:26 PM by Jesper »

The following users thanked this post: kav, Reyth, boyd30