Author Topic: Question regarding two dozens  (Read 2936 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mr j

Question regarding two dozens
« on: August 29, 2017, 10:21:40 PM »
(00 wheel)......Lets say I am betting the 1st & 2nd dozen.

What are my worse two numbers on the wheel, I DON'T want to hit? Meaning, if one of my two dozen numbers dont hit, I dont want____to hit.

Ken
 

kav

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2017, 10:27:33 PM »
I guess you expect us to say the two zeroes?
 

mr j

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2017, 10:41:49 PM »
No.

Thats your answer. Thanks for the advice.

Ken
 

scepticus

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2017, 11:37:49 PM »

For me, Mr.J, it would depend on previous numbers .
Does this relate to your idea of leaving out one number in a street ?
Why  not leave out a whole street  ? Or a Double  Street ?
 

Trilobite

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2017, 12:03:11 AM »
27, 28.
 
The following users thanked this post: heatmap

scepticus

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2017, 01:54:23 AM »

Trilo
I think Mr J. wants to know WHY you think 27 and 28 should be left out.
So why ?
 

Trilobite

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2017, 02:29:44 AM »
I don't think Mr j does this, but people playing 2 dozens might cover the zeros just in case. Numbers 27, 28 are neighbours to the zeros, so they would piss you off the most if they hit. :)
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth

heatmap

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2017, 02:50:08 AM »
Let me just tell you,  your bet, 2 dozens, is almost identical to dozen 2 and 3 combined, and we'll as column 2 and 3 combined . Cover your zeros bro. Trust me on this.
 

mr j

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2017, 03:06:06 AM »
I guess you expect us to say the two zeroes?

Well, I guess we have different answers.

Ken
 

scepticus

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #9 on: August 30, 2017, 01:25:16 PM »
And your answer , ken, is ?  ;D
 

mr j

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #10 on: August 30, 2017, 01:41:54 PM »
......it makes no difference regarding the zeros. Just wanted to see the mindset of others. I kind of already knew what to expect in regards to answers. We have 14 numbers AGAINST us. As far as the 27, 28 example, what if I had said the 1st & 3rd dozens we are betting?

 and dont get me started on the silliness of "hedging". You can just as simply hedge the 33/36. Everyone focuses so much on the zeros except when its testing time. Then all of a sudden, zeros dont exist (lol).

Dont waste your time on the outside bets. You'll regret it long term. If you dont agree with my post here, thats cool but you will CONTINUE to be stuck. Stuck now and stuck five years from now.

Ken
 

kav

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #11 on: August 30, 2017, 02:33:44 PM »
MrJ,
as I have explained in this post, IMO making blanket statements about isolated parameters of a strategy (few numbers, many numbers, cold, hot, increase when you lose etc.) is naive. A strategy is a combination of many parameters. It is the synergy between them that produces the results. Playing many of few numbers alone doesn't offer any kind of advantage or disadvantage.
 

Trilobite

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #12 on: August 30, 2017, 10:12:37 PM »
The 27-28 example is not something I would consider. Playing 2 dozens is also something I would not consider.

I was merely trying to answer a silly question with some sense of logic for a 2 dozen bet.

So what is your answer Ken?
 

mr j

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #13 on: August 31, 2017, 12:31:23 AM »
I answered, #10.

Ken
 

Trilobite

Re: Question regarding two dozens
« Reply #14 on: August 31, 2017, 01:35:36 AM »
...As far as the 27, 28 example, what if I had said the 1st & 3rd dozens we are betting?

But you didn't say 1st & 3rd, you said 1st & 2nd.

If you had said 1st & 3rd I would have said there is no difference.

If you had said 2nd & 3rd I would have said 1 & 2 for the same reason I said 27 & 28.

 :)