Author Topic: Crazy Neighbour  (Read 1290 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ignatus

Crazy Neighbour
« on: May 08, 2017, 12:38:29 AM »
OK this may be one of my best WHEEL system/strategy. What i recently discovered by studying a chart of 37 spins cycles, IS that hotnumbers ALWAYS hit in clusters. (As you see in the charts attached) Have you ever seen a single hotnumber alone in these charts? NO. THEREFORE betting a hotnumbers neighbours should be played with an aggressive negative progression, BECAUSE it's bound to hit sooner or later. So, there you go!

Procedure: Wait for a hotnumber. Now, you bet that particular hotnumber's 6 neighbours. (3 on each side). You bet these 6 neighbours UNTIL HIT.

Progression: Negative. THE progression i use is crazy and it's my own invention (you could use another 6 numbers progression if you like) *First do 6 spins, then double bets, then double bets after each 3 losses in a row, until hit.

BR/Stoploss: minimum 500u.
 
The following users thanked this post: kav

ignatus

Re: Crazy Neighbour
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2017, 12:40:40 AM »
Test 1,2,3
 

kav

Re: Crazy Neighbour
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2017, 04:00:54 AM »
The progression is crazy, but the idea is nice!
 
The following users thanked this post: ignatus

ignatus

Re: Crazy Neighbour
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2017, 09:20:21 AM »
The progression is crazy, but the idea is nice!

Yes. :) Do you have any other negative 6 numbers progression?
 

ignatus

Re: Crazy Neighbour
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2017, 09:21:47 AM »
6/6 Games won
 

ignatus

Re: Crazy Neighbour
« Reply #5 on: May 08, 2017, 11:09:55 AM »
Well, obviously we need another 6 numbers progression.

Don't use my progression suggested in the first post!

We also need a larger bank than 500u. (?)

There's alot work testing the best progression and set stoploss, wingoal and BR needed.

I need help/advice on this one.
 

ignatus

Re: Crazy Neighbour
« Reply #6 on: May 08, 2017, 12:05:03 PM »
OK i found the best progression for this one; Oscar's Grind.

I tried a negative progression; winkel's extended fibonacci, and it turned out to be a loser (first chart!)

I tried a positive progression; Oscar's Grind (with the same spins), and it turned out to be a winner (as you can see in the second chart!)

Still a BR of 1000u is needed.
 
The following users thanked this post: Reyth