Author Topic: progressions for "cover the table"  (Read 1117 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


progressions for "cover the table"
« on: March 12, 2017, 01:44:58 AM »

There are players like to cover a large area of the carpet.

It is not very good practice if the house advantages is high.

If there is a return on zero for EC bets they should be used so much as possible.

At a NOZ we can cover more without the cost to the house.

If we cover two dozen and at the same spin two columns, we have covered 32 numbers.

We win only on 16 numbers.
Lose small on 16 numbers.
Lose all on 4 numbers. (on NOZ otherwise 5 or 6)

Can this work?

I have done a number of play (several 100), and won them all.

It  must be played on line with very low starting bets.

The progression is negative.

On a total loss we progress using hexagonal* series.
On a partial loss we progress using triangular* series.
This numbers are figurative series with some interesting properties.
We increase the bet after every loss, and stay on a win (exception see next line).
If we do not need the full bet to reach new high we may reduce it.

We start with one cent each bet, and should be ready for betting much more.
The winning rate is faster than I thought.

* A triangular series is adding the spin number to the last bet.
  1 =0 +  1 = 1
  2 = 1 +  2 = 3
  3 = 3  + 3 = 6
  4 = 6  + 4 = 10
  0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55, 66, 78, 91, 105, 120, 136, 153, 171, 190, 210, 231, 253, 276, 300, 325, 351, 378, 406 …

A hexagonal series is the same as triangular every second step.
1, 6, 15, 28, 45, 66, 91, 120, 153, 190, 231, 276, 325, 378, 435, 496, 561, 630, 703, 780, 861, 946...
« Last Edit: March 12, 2017, 01:48:32 AM by Jesper »
The following users thanked this post: Jake007, december, Reyth, jekhb76


Re: progressions for "cover the table"
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2017, 04:10:20 AM »
Jesper it is a very interesting concept! Its similar to covering the table with large amounts of chips, 36u on high, 2u each on three numbers, covering double streets, etc. But that requires a large bet size. What you have done is the same bet in its most simple form.

For me just playing it flat doesnt go up much and doesnt go down much. So the profit could really come on the progression.

Now my question would be, If I have a 4u bet (2 dozens and 2 columns) how do we follow the two types of progressions?
The following users thanked this post: Reyth, jekhb76


Re: progressions for "cover the table"
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2017, 06:55:22 AM »
As I play it, the progressions is the same on oth type of bets.
Let say we got bets on the two first dozens  1-12, 13-24 and the two columns 1-34,2-35. like pic1.

Number 14 hits and we win 2 u.

We bet  one on each as it is new high. 18 hit and we lost one u.
Next bet is 12 u three on each as pic2.
Number seven wins and we is on new high balance of  7.
We reset to one u each as pic1. 
32 hit a loss of one u.
We bet as pic2 three units each. 10 hit and we are on new high  12.
Bet again as pic1. 19 hit we won and are  14.
We repeat as pic1.  24 hit, a loss of one u, so next bet is as pic2.
Number 8 hit a win, we are now  19.

Most of the time we lose, but a few, just on 5 numbers there is a total loss, and the progression will take two steps in the triangular series, or (which is the same as one hexagonal step).
So if we bet 3 on each and lose all, next is 10 on each.

I have done over 200 game, and never bust yet. I have been betting 4x120 as most.

If a win not put a new high, we stay at the progression and try to win twice after each other.
If the bets are high at the last attempt and we are close to new high, we can reduce the bet so we bet
lower, but still reach a new high.

The answer to your question may be simply, we progress all bets the same amount each spin.

As we can see a cent table is best for the game, we must still like to place 100 to 300 times more, and the winning
is larger on the higher bets.

« Last Edit: March 12, 2017, 06:58:12 AM by Jesper »
The following users thanked this post: Jake007


Re: progressions for "cover the table"
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2017, 07:51:06 AM »

Here is my worse session (played this morning) the downdrown was at most 10000 or 100 Euro.

At the progression step of 666 on each I continue flat betting, and with a magical luck went back and won 575 u.

All methods can fail, this session had a very high number of zero hits. 8 in 67 spins. So it may had been better at NOZ, but there it needs a 5 times higher bank.

If it could not be saved, the loss should be in the range of 120 Euro.
The method have won more before this session.

My stop loss was at three times at
level 666, which never happen.