### Author Topic: Best progression for 4 numbers bet  (Read 9500 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

#### kav

##### Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« on: December 29, 2016, 04:11:14 PM »
I'm looking for ideas about wagering plans for betting 4 numbers.
I have my own ideas which I will share later.

Translating various bets to even chances

#### Sputnik

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2016, 05:50:27 PM »

Kav i mention i save some work from others with no solution as i had not time to get involved.
But as you into 4 number bet or Quad i wanted to show you a Matrix by Kimo Li.
Combine that with EC probability cycles and staking plan and a Matrix solution to solve.
Some food for toughts.

When you have time you will find thid PDF a good read - see attach file ...

The following users thanked this post: kav, Reyth

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #2 on: December 29, 2016, 07:00:49 PM »
Just want to quote Reyth's post here about turbo's 4-number bet progression:

Quote
I really like the Turbo method on a quad -- spin 8 times and raise 1, upon 2 hits in 8 spins, lower the chips by 1/2 rounding up.  This method is very tough to beat but the successive sequences from heck are still out there...

The following users thanked this post: Reyth

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #3 on: December 29, 2016, 10:15:31 PM »
Some data:
4-numbers bet
`Spins	Probability % to...	...hit at least once	...hit exactly once	...hit more than once	...sleep all spins1	10.810810810810807	10.810810810810807	0		89.18918918918922	20.452885317750173	19.284149013878746	1.1687363038714267	79.547114682249833	29.052573391506925	25.799064221270214	3.253509170236711	70.947426608493074	36.722565457289946	30.679968263132142	6.042597194157803	63.2774345427100545	43.56336919163698	34.20401867173516	9.359350519901817	56.436630808363026	49.66462657632486	36.607544308127366	13.057082268197497	50.335373423675147	55.10628856807354	38.09163394224065	17.01465462583289	44.893711431926468	59.95966277693044	38.82699367085532	21.13266910607512	40.040337223069569	64.28834788212716	38.958165946770386	25.33018193535677	35.71165211787284510	68.1490670300053	38.60719147878146	29.54187555122384	31.85093296999469811	71.5924111348696	37.876785153507214	33.71562598136238	28.40758886513040712	74.6635018229918	36.853088257466474	37.81041356552533	25.33649817700820313	77.40258270699269	35.60805149201153	41.794531214981156	22.59741729300731814	79.84554673866914	34.20149644347054	45.6440502951986	20.15445326133085415	82.02440655070491	32.68289718053652	49.34150937016839	17.97559344929508616	83.9677139506287	31.092918398780693	52.87479555184801	16.03228604937129417	85.70093406407425	29.46474192857427	56.23619213549998	14.29906593592574818	87.24677903012028	27.825209388828483	59.421569641291796	12.75322096987972219	88.62550562145863	26.19580523542862	62.42970038603001	11.37449437854137320	89.85518068940904	24.593501359008375	65.26167933040067	10.14481931059095621	90.95191791217563	23.031481678098388	67.92043623407724	9.04808208782436622	91.93008894869719	21.51976280347417	70.41032614522302	8.06991105130281423	92.80251176505425	20.065724776212402	72.73678698884184	7.197488234945752524	93.5806186012646	18.67456406904844	74.90605453221616	6.41938139873540225	94.27460577950626	17.349679456041628	76.92492632346463	5.72539422049373626	94.89356731685693	16.09299997111753	78.80056734573941	5.10643268314306327	95.44561409341294	14.905262967012185	80.54035112640076	4.55438590658705528	95.9379801373683	13.786249230750006	82.1517309066183	4.06201986263169929	96.37711741981497	12.734981190953434	83.64213622886153	3.622882580185028630	96.7687804014566	11.749889449248741	85.01889095220785	3.23121959854340431	97.11810143913696	10.828952168091408	86.28914927104556	2.881898560863036532	97.42965804031135	9.969811237580235	87.45984680273112	2.570341959688654333	97.70753284676417	9.169868612943308	88.53766423382086	2.292467153235826534	97.95536713360048	8.426365752434391	89.52900138116608	2.044632866399521535	98.17640852456259	7.736448683673866	90.43995984088872	1.823591475437410736	98.3735535489342	7.097220877378032	91.27633267155616	1.626446451065799`
« Last Edit: December 29, 2016, 10:32:23 PM by kav »

The following users thanked this post: Reyth

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #4 on: January 03, 2017, 07:54:44 PM »
Like Bayes has pointed out and like the previous table shows, there is a 50% probability of one or more appearances in the first 6 spins and 50% probability of no hit on the first 6 spins.

The average expectation though is 1 hit every 9 spins, or to be more exact, taking zero into account) 1 hit every 9,25 spins.

I suggest you read this article where I explain the difference between probability and expectation for the 5 numbers bet (neighbours bet) which is very similar.

(this posts is a draft - to be continued)

The following users thanked this post: Reyth

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2017, 12:38:55 PM »
Test of 20,000 spins
 Dozens Longest Gap Evens Longest Gap Dozen 1 (1-12) 22 Red 15 Dozen 2 (13-24) 20 Black 13 Dozen 3 (25-36) 20 Even 15 Row 1 (1,4,7,10..) 22 Odd 13 Row 2 (2,5,8,11..) 22 High 13 Row 3 (3,6,9,12..) 23 Low 14

Bet: Quad, Corner, 4-numbers, specifically these numbers:14,15,17,18
Number frequency:
14: 500 hits
15: 527 hits
17: 588 hits
18: 546 hits
Gap Analysis
Gap or Skip is the spins between two appearances of the bet.
Longest Gap: 85 spins
Count: 2162 gaps
Sum: 20000
Mean: 9.2506938020352
Median: 7

The following users thanked this post: Sputnik, Reyth

#### Sputnik

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2017, 03:28:43 PM »

Is that a software making does results - where can i get this - i can buy it for Money.

Cheers

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #7 on: January 06, 2017, 05:22:43 PM »
Hi Sputnik,

Here is the :
gaps calculator

Then I enter the raw gap data into
Mean, Median, Mode Calculator
and come up with more stats.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 11:22:39 PM by kav »

The following users thanked this post: Reyth

#### Scarface

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #8 on: January 06, 2017, 09:56:11 PM »
Just want to quote Reyth's post here about turbo's 4-number bet progression:

Quote
I really like the Turbo method on a quad -- spin 8 times and raise 1, upon 2 hits in 8 spins, lower the chips by 1/2 rounding up.  This method is very tough to beat but the successive sequences from heck are still out there...

This is a good idea, but could get quite expensive.  If the worse case is a gap of 85, that would mean you would have to double at least 10 times!

If it reaches 8 spins with no hit, I would keep the bet the same until a hit is made.  Once it hits, raise bet enough units to profit if you hit twice in the next 12 spins.  If it makes it another 12 spins with no hit, raise bet again so that you could profit in the next 12, etc

The following users thanked this post: Reyth

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #9 on: January 06, 2017, 10:24:36 PM »
Scarface,
I agree with you.
One thing we could count on is that it is rare for long sequences to follow each other. It can happen, but it is an exception. If we find a money management that can recoup the losses from the few consecutive long gaps with the wins of the many consecutive short (6 and less) gaps we will have a winner.

In all my tests the absolute longest gap is 95 spins. In 20K spins the longest gap is on average around 65 spins.
« Last Edit: January 06, 2017, 11:23:08 PM by kav »

The following users thanked this post: Reyth, Scarface

#### Scarface

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #10 on: January 06, 2017, 11:51:03 PM »
With those gaps as worse case scenario, I think a workable system is very possible.  Working on a progestin for this now.  Will post back soon

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #11 on: January 07, 2017, 12:35:45 AM »
Our enemy is not only the 65spins type of gap but for example 2 or 3 25-spin gaps after each other, which is quite uncommon, but can be ruin if we have the wrong progression.
The good thing is that half (50%) of the gaps are 6 or less spins.

#### Sputnik

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #12 on: January 07, 2017, 04:46:12 AM »
If you pick one particular quad or any quad you can measuring STDS as you use the quad with cycle that make it become a EC bet odds - whish make it very simple to caculate.

Minus sign - is a hit within six attempts and a plus sign + is a missing cycle and a equal sign = is a hit at the 6th attempt.

- + = + - - + - - - + - + - + - + + + = + + + + + + + + = + =

Above you can see a quad for 300 spins and a 2.5 STDS at the end.
12 contra 2 events.
With four level progression winning two in a row you would lose against 4.04 STDS.
For example:
(Level 1 - \$10-\$16-\$22-\$28-\$34-\$40 = \$150
(Level 2 - \$15-\$24-\$33-\$42-\$51-\$60 = \$225
(Level 3 - \$30-\$48-\$66-\$84-\$102-\$120 = \$450
(Level 4 - \$60-\$96-\$132-\$168-\$204-\$240 = \$900
See this topic https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php?topic=1263.0

24 contra 3
+ + + + + + - + + + + + + - + + + + + + - + + + + + +

NOTE i only bet for one quad or cycle when a quad has hit once and not the other way around.
See Bayes topic https://www.roulettelife.com/index.php?topic=1294.0

« Last Edit: January 07, 2017, 04:51:23 AM by Sputnik »

The following users thanked this post: kav

#### kav

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #13 on: January 08, 2017, 12:55:13 PM »
Sputnik,
I guess each + represent a sequence where the hit appeared after the 6th spin, right?
The big question is what do we do after the 6th spin? Do we keep betting? Or we only bet the first 6 spins after a hit?
If we keep betting after the 6th spin then the actual length of a + sequence if of great importance.

The probabilistic problem that makes the puzzle hard to solve is that after the 6th spin, can theoretically begin a new cycle, so betting after the 6th spin can be considered a new sequence and equal to betting in the first 6 spins. (theoretically there is no difference since roulette has no memory)

The following users thanked this post: Sputnik

#### Jesper

##### Re: Best progression for 4 numbers bet
« Reply #14 on: January 08, 2017, 01:28:51 PM »
Corners and EU basket I may use  the progression
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 6 6 9 9 12 .

We will get runs when all steps lose, and then it is up when it happens.

The following users thanked this post: kav